DEV debug C function cannot be used-CodePudding

Win10 system
Once in debugging will

Tool in the editor options should be open is yes

CodePudding user response:

Tools - & gt; The compiler options - & gt; Settings - & gt; Would - & gt; The generate was debugging information to be set to yes, then execute - & gt; Rebuild all regenerated,

CodePudding user response:

Don't use the DEV, worst will c + + BUilder

CodePudding user response:

I fry, CB is a bottom line, it whole, actually CB is very strong, the compiler, based on the clang/LLVM modify compatibility is very good also, basically, in addition to the free nothing faults,

CodePudding user response:

reference DelphiGuy reply: 3/f

I fry, CB is a bottom line, it whole, actually CB is very strong, the compiler, based on the clang/LLVM modify compatibility is very good also, basically, in addition to the free nothing faults,

He said the worst of, dozen is close to scold is love,

CodePudding user response:

reference 4 floor u010165006 response:

Quote: reference DelphiGuy reply: 3/f

I fry, CB is a bottom line, it whole, actually CB is very strong, the compiler, based on the clang/LLVM modify compatibility is very good also, basically, in addition to the free nothing faults,

He said the worst of, dozen is close to scold is love,

Say son

CodePudding user response:

hook after debugging and so on

CodePudding user response:

refer to 6th floor qq_39607860 response:

whole hook after debugging and so on

Are you using TMD, you can use UltraStudio or Eclipse CDT

CodePudding user response:

TDM is ok?

CodePudding user response:

I use dev - c + + standard installation package is ok, no problem, the building Lord show TDM - GCC 4.9.2 32 - bit profiling estimation is a modified version, replace the standard installation package of GCC (own is GCC 3.4.2, older),

CodePudding user response:

So I want to know that don't change the compiler's case, how can you solve this problem

CodePudding user response:

in a version solved
Not easy!

CodePudding user response:

You download the TDM, reload the eclipse CDT, itself the default support TDM, you can have a try, use ultrastudio also support, these I have tried before,

CodePudding user response:

If the above steps still not solve the problem, it is possible is operating system zlib1. The DLL file is missing,
After the download put to C: \ Windows \ system32 directory

CodePudding user response:

reference DelphiGuy reply: 3/f

I fry, CB is a bottom line, it whole, actually CB is very strong, the compiler, based on the clang/LLVM modify compatibility is very good also, basically, in addition to the free nothing faults,

Don't spoil,, I now the most irritated is two points:
1. Every now and then the collapse of the IDE
2. To write code, automatic hint that slow ah,,, why the DELPHI automatic prompt so fast,,,,,,,

CodePudding user response:

Why VS code hinting so fast, is a c + +,,, but with VS interface is a torment, really torture,,,

CodePudding user response:

Grasp the principal contradiction, and other recognition,

CodePudding user response:

reference 15 floor draculamx response:

why VS code hinting so fast, is a c + +,,, but the use of VS in interface is a torment, really torture,,,

Because vs tip is static, and CB, Delphi tip is dynamic, real-time syntax checking,

CodePudding user response:

refer to 17th floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: reference 15 floor draculamx response:

Why VS code hinting so fast, is a c + +,,, but the use of VS in interface is a torment, really torture,,,

Because vs tip is static, and CB, Delphi tip is dynamic, real-time syntax checking,

1. Why don't BCB to make static
2. The same is dynamic, why the grammar of the DELPHI prompt much faster, and almost VS a speed, and the BCB is slow

CodePudding user response:

Because CB project can be used directly in the Delphi unit, so you must also can prompt the Delphi grammar, using the same technology, static implementation is based on knowledge base + source Code scanning, the essence is the text search, dynamic implementation in addition to the text search, and syntax scanning, can real-time detect syntax errors, so sometimes when knock Code at the bottom of the IDE in the message window will appear Unable to invoke Code Completion is due to the errors in the source Code, even if no other source, from dynamic implementation. Lib,, obj, dcu to get information,

CodePudding user response:

references the 19th floor DelphiGuy response:

because CB project can be used directly in the Delphi unit, so you must also can prompt the Delphi grammar, using the same technology, static implementation is based on knowledge base + source Code scanning, the essence is the text search, dynamic implementation in addition to the text search, and syntax scanning, can real-time detect syntax errors, so sometimes when knock Code at the bottom of the IDE in the message window will appear Unable to invoke Code Completion is due to the errors in the source Code, even if no other source, from dynamic implementation. Lib,, obj, dcu to get information,

Don't use CB will include a solid-state drives,,,,

CodePudding user response:

With a solid definitely useful ah, additional memory,

CodePudding user response:

Delphi compiler was said to have been of more quickly than the CB, so grammar scan should be faster, tip is fast,

CodePudding user response:

reference u010165006 22nd floor response:

Delphi compiler was said to have been of more quickly than the CB, so grammar scan should be faster, tip is fast,

That yes, Delphi's former chief scientist Allen Bauer had complained to Google is responsible for the chrome project c + + compiler too slow, 20 nuclear 40 threads E5 build a secondary hours,
nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull