I have the following code:
int add_ii(int a, int b) { return a b; }
unsigned add_iu(int a, unsigned b) { return a b; }
unsigned add_ui(unsigned a, int b) { return a b; }
unsigned add_uu(unsigned a, unsigned b) { return a b; }
#define add(LEFT, RIGHT) \
_Generic(LEFT \
,int: _Generic(RIGHT \
,int: add_ii \
,unsigned: add_iu \
) \
,unsigned: _Generic(RIGHT \
,int: add_ui \
,unsigned: add_uu \
) \
)(LEFT, RIGHT)
int main() {
return add(1, add(2, add(3, 4)));
}
The problem is that RIGHT
is expanded for each _Generic
case. In the above, RIGHT
is used 3 times, so add(2, add(3, 4))
is fully expanded 3 times, so add(3, 4)
is expanded 9 times. The number grows exponentially with each nested usage and with each additional type handled inside _Generic
. This is not an issue in itself - but it causes preprocessor to generate very big output, which significantly stalls the compilation process and causes very high compilation memory usage.
Is there any way to write 2-dimensional _Generic
so that RIGHT
is not expanded each time for each type?
Switching LEFT
with RIGHT
is of course not an option and wouldn't do much - LEFT
will be then expanded that many times.
I know I can use GNU extensions, but the idea is that I would like to do without them:
#define add(LEFT, RIGHT0) ({
__auto_type LEFT = LEFT0;
__auto_type RIGHT = RIGHT0;
_Generic(LEFT, .....)(LEFT, RIGHT)
})
I can write kind of a map, but that erases return type information and requires all function types to be cast to a common type, or to use some unsafe va_arg
:
unsigned add_ii_adaptor(unsigned a, unsigned b) { return add_ii(a, b); }
unsigned add_iu_adaptor(unsigned a, unsigned b) { return add_iu(a, b); }
unsigned add_ui_adaptor(unsigned a, unsigned b) { return add_ui(a, b); }
static unsigned (*const funcarr[])(unsigned a, unsigned b) = {
add_ii_adaptor,
add_iu_adaptor,
add_ui_adaptor,
add_uu,
};
#define typeidx(x) _Generic((x), int: 0, unsigned 1)
#define add(LEFT, RIGHT) \
funcarr[typeidx(LEFT) << 1 | typeidx(RIGHT)](LEFT, RIGHT)
Is there a method that I'm overlooking?
Background: However, what is the ultimate point here?
I'm implementing Integer safety n2792 without GNU extensions here. There are 26 types I want to support, ckd_add(x, y, z)
makes it 17576 combinations of types. (This can be reduced, but nonetheless). In the examples above the return type is the promoted type of operands, so unsigned int = unsigned
, but like for example it could be long char = long *or unsigned long!*
.
CodePudding user response:
It is possible use _Generic
with mapping a tuple to an integer. You need a type parameterized by an integer and C provides such a family ... arrays.
However, arrays cannot be used as dispatched argument because an array decays to pointer. However, pointers to arrays do not decay.
Just compute a size of array using typeidx
-like macro and use is as a size of an new array type. Add 1
because C forbids zero-size arrays.
Next form a pointer to it using compound literal.
E.q. (int(*)[3]) { 0 }
.
Finally, use the type of this literal to dispatch a proper function pointer.
#define TYPE_TO_NUM(X) _Generic((X), int: 0, unsigned: 1)
#define add(LEFT, RIGHT) \
_Generic( \
(int(*)[1 2 * TYPE_TO_NUM(LEFT) TYPE_TO_NUM(RIGHT)]) { 0 } \
,int(*)[1]: add_ii \
,int(*)[2]: add_iu \
,int(*)[3]: add_ui \
,int(*)[4]: add_uu \
)(LEFT, RIGHT)
The solution still has exponential complexity due to expanding LEFT
and RIGHT
twice but is far faster than the original one.