Well,,, all good

CodePudding user response:

C + + Builder and Visual Studio, you such comparisons are in more IDE, is natural VS to use, especially IDE on stability is better than the cb wrongly,
If it is based on the framework of the win32 programming, cb VCL than MFC is one hundred times easier to use,

CodePudding user response:

Of c + + language c + + Builder extension, so as to introduce components, event processing, properties, and so on the new features, kung fu at the compiler level, the generated source code is very concise, due to the extension of the standard features, the use of c + + Builder VCL source cannot be other compiler, VC do kung fu in source level, although the message mapping code is more complicated and not intuitive, but compatibility is very good, with any ANSI standard MFC program theory are compiled by the compiler, MFC function very comprehensive, and very stable, little bug, VC can also support component, but by Mr AppWizard into a "package" class (wrapper), than the VCL as concise, there are a lot of people use c + + Builder is blunt control board that a lot of components, the components use of VC can also many (maybe less than c + + Builder), but due to the inconvenience of RAD programmers unattractive

Simple and professional quality, RAD in c + + Builder is good, good stability and less bugs VC

CodePudding user response:

reference 1st floor sololie response:

c + + Builder and Visual Studio, you such comparisons are in more IDE, nature is VS works, especially on the stability of IDE far better than the cb,
If it is based on the framework of the win32 programming, cb VCL than MFC is one hundred times easier to use,

Qt Creator compare with CBC?

CodePudding user response:

refer to the second floor sunxingzhesun response:

c + + Builder for c + + language extensions, so that the introduction of components, event processing, properties, and so on the new features, kung fu at the compiler level, the generated source code is very concise, due to the extension of the standard features, the use of c + + Builder VCL source cannot be other compiler, VC do kung fu in source level, although the message mapping code is more complicated and not intuitive, but compatibility is very good, with any ANSI standard MFC program theory are compiled by the compiler, MFC function very comprehensive, and very stable, little bug, VC can also support component, but by Mr AppWizard into a "package" class (wrapper), than the VCL as concise, there are a lot of people use c + + Builder is blunt control board that a lot of components, the components use of VC can also many (maybe less than c + + Builder), but due to the inconvenience of RAD programmers unattractive

Simple and professional quality, RAD in c + + Builder is good, good stability and less bugs VC good

Qt Creator compare with CBC?

CodePudding user response:

Both are good, use is different, we can combine to use, use c + + builder for interface, using VC to do the background, also can be used independent, as long as kung fu deep, what all good,

CodePudding user response:

reference 5 floor guanchaoyi reply:

both are quite good, use different, we can combine to use, use c + + builder for interface, using VC to do the background, can also be independent, as long as kung fu deep, what all good,

agree with upstairs

CodePudding user response:

reference 5 floor guanchaoyi reply:

both are quite good, use different, we can combine to use, use c + + builder for interface, using VC to do the background, can also be independent, as long as kung fu deep, what all good,

Yes, solid language foundation, with what tools are no difference,
But said the two different purposes, it is wrong, use have what different, are all programming, specific projects what tools to use, cheap, good for platform support, maintenance costs low in the late... Then use which,

CodePudding user response:

Vs stability is still relatively strong

CodePudding user response:

Met a few bugs in the CB, but also few, a total of ten years to change the thinking around in the past,

CodePudding user response:

The key is to see what do you want to do, BCB VCL is very good, he is a man of good packaging, the function that makes the problem of the embedded debug VS is quite powerful, but vs2005 and vs2008 conflict each other, don't know the back of the version will appear the phenomenon,

CodePudding user response:

Are all tools, in whose hands with, a knife, is a kitchen knife in the hands of a chef in XX is a weapon in his hand,
Usually such causes controversies, finally develop into personal attacks,

CodePudding user response:

Apple and snow pear that eat a little bit better?

CodePudding user response:

By the way, digging the university professional teacher said:
in fact, no matter what tools are good, as long as can meet your needs, can complete the task, they can learn more knowledge! Language is not good or bad, so is the development tools, according to different development direction, using a different compiler is the best choice...

CodePudding user response:

Many slaughterer, not kill pig knife even can't kill a pig, as for the masters, a knife can also be easily slaughter a pig,

Some binding himself in tools, lost tools, like lost soul, can't do anything, but once the tools in hand, like a dozen doping, ACTS as the impressive,

Cannot say tool is not important, after all, to do a good job, must first sharpen his machine, no matter use which compiler, which framework, before work, must first grinding polishing, and ACTS to fast, don't believe that the high master, legendary weapons of China know everything, everything that can readily stick to, that's not a master is a god figure,

CodePudding user response:

VS, of course good, support for mobile development, BCB support?

CodePudding user response:

C + + Builder RAD

CodePudding user response:

11 references ccrun response:

are all tools, in whose hands, a sword, is a kitchen knife in the hands of a chef in XX is a weapon in his hand,
Usually such causes controversies, finally develop into personal attacks,

F1

CodePudding user response:

This is as what specific things, xcode also can also