Quote: refer to the 13th floor akirya response:

BCC32C and BCC64, Clang - enhanced for Windows, with a c + + compilers are both updated to 3.3 and Clang LLVM 3.3.
Finally the upgrade

In the mainstream of C/C + + compiler, Clang/LLVM most garbage, large and slow, general optimization ability, does not support unicode said, is not as good as in the GCC compiler, in addition to the cross-platform, I can't figure out the meaning of EMB use it, but when it comes to cross-platform, now Delphi is cross-platform, the compiler is EMB yourself, CB compiler oneself do very difficult? Because of Delphi and CB would have Shared the compiler backend (optimization, code generation), actually the need to do is front parser part, don't want to do is copy the GCC source can also be (Apple did before), now the EMB to maintain at least three sets of compiler architecture: 32/64 Delphi compiler, CB traditional 32-bit compiler, CB 32/64 a compiler, is more complicated than ever before, where you couldn't see save trouble, EMB now no Anders Hejlsberg, Danny Thorpe do compiler, the compiler group was a Japanese in leadership, held out hope for its level,

If c + + compiler easily, why waste the manpower to maintain 2 set of c + + compiler,

CodePudding user response:

Is not very easy, but also is not very complex (at least than Ada compiler is simple, the complexity of the Ada compiler is about 2.5 times that of the c + + compiler), with EMB inherited from Borland/CodeGear technical ability, maintain an own c + + compiler front-end (you can also copy the GCC source), and the Delphi compiler Shared backend, this is the simplest (this is in fact N years before come), is to give up their own c + + compiler front-end with GCC also stronger than with a Clang/LLVM, of course, the best solution to the authorization of Intel c + + compiler is, if you do have to do first-class, also want to use better with others, don't just pick up a free of garbage,

CodePudding user response:

Clang/LLVM GCCC compilation speed is fast

CodePudding user response:

RAD 10 support Unicode variable

 class tt 
{
String a="ww"; 
String name="lei jun"; 
}; 

CodePudding user response:

refer to the 18th floor DelphiGuy response:

is not easy, but also is not very complex (at least than Ada compiler is simple, the complexity of the Ada compiler is about 2.5 times that of the c + + compiler), with EMB inherited from Borland/CodeGear technical ability, maintain an own c + + compiler front end (you can also copy the GCC source), and the Delphi compiler Shared backend, this is the simplest (this is in fact N years before come), is to give up their own c + + compiler front-end with GCC also stronger than with a Clang/LLVM, of course the best solution is to obtain the authorization of Intel c + + compiler, if you do have to do first-class, also want to use better with others, don't just pick up a free of garbage,

Don't know Ada
Anyway, I met with GCC correct code to compile the wrong question, the trouble is not regular, don't know what time will go wrong, is far away from the GCC,

CodePudding user response:

Now fast enough to harmony, this just out for a few days, big butt harmonious tool has come, ha ha

CodePudding user response:

reference ksrsoft 20 floor response:

RAD 10 support Unicode variable

 class tt 
{
String a="ww"; 
String name="lei jun"; 
}; 

Are you, haven't tried,

CodePudding user response:

XE8 also useless ah,,, also in XE7,,, make so many version do what ah,,,,
Still can happy play,,,,

CodePudding user response:

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull