I am trying to speed up the base::expand.grid()
function. I came across this amazing answer How to speed up `expand.grid()` in R?. However, the behavior I need relies on a data.frame passed to the base::expand.grid()
function, but unfortunately, the suggested (faster) functions have slightly different behavior when receiving data.frames. For instance, this is the behavior I need.
x <- c(.3,.6)
df <- as.data.frame(rbind(x, 1 - x))
df
## V1 V2
## x 0.3 0.6
## 0.7 0.4
(base::expand.grid(df))
## V1 V2
## 1 0.3 0.6
## 2 0.7 0.6
## 3 0.3 0.4
## 4 0.7 0.4
However, this is what I am getting out of faster functions:
library(tidyr)
library(data.table)
(tidyr::expand_grid(df))
## # A tibble: 2 × 2
## V1 V2
## <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 0.3 0.6
## 2 0.7 0.4
##
(tidyr::crossing(df))
# A tibble: 2 × 2
## V1 V2
## <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 0.3 0.6
## 2 0.7 0.4
(as_tibble(data.table::CJ(df,sorted = FALSE)))
## # A tibble: 2 × 1
## df$`` $``
## <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 0.3 0.6
## 2 0.7 0.4
Do you know how I could tweak said functions to resemble the base::expand.grid()
when it received a data.frame, of course, without losing the gains in performance?
Thank you in advance!
BTW: I am already aware of the existence of:
CodePudding user response:
Try with do.call
> do.call(tidyr::expand_grid, df)
# A tibble: 4 x 2
V1 V2
<dbl> <dbl>
1 0.3 0.6
2 0.3 0.4
3 0.7 0.6
4 0.7 0.4
> do.call(tidyr::crossing, df)
# A tibble: 4 x 2
V1 V2
<dbl> <dbl>
1 0.3 0.4
2 0.3 0.6
3 0.7 0.4
4 0.7 0.6
> do.call(data.table::CJ, df)
V1 V2
1: 0.3 0.4
2: 0.3 0.6
3: 0.7 0.4
4: 0.7 0.6
CodePudding user response:
Try tidyr::expand()
tidyr::expand(df,df[,1],df[,2])