This is on iOS 15.5 using the latest SwiftUI standards.
I have these two structs in my SwiftUI application:
User.swift
struct User: Codable, Identifiable, Hashable {
let id: String
let name: String
let socialID: String?
func getSocialID() async -> String {
// calls another API to get the socialID using the user's id
// code omitted
// example response:
// {
// id: "aaaa",
// name: "User1",
// social_id: "user_1_social_id",
// }
}
}
Video.swift
struct Video: Codable, Identifiable, Hashable {
let id: String
let title: String
let uploadUser: User
}
My SwiftUI application displays a list of videos, the list of videos are obtained from an API (which I have no control over), the response looks like this:
[
{
id: "AAAA",
title: "My first video. ",
uploaded_user: { id: "aaaa", name: "User1" },
},
{
id: "BBBB",
title: "My second video. ",
uploaded_user: { id: "aaaa", name: "User1" },
},
]
My video's view model looks like this:
VideoViewModel.swift
@MainActor
class VideoViewModel: ObservableObject {
@Published var videoList: [Video]
func getVideos() async {
// code simplified
let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared.data(for: videoApiRequest)
let decoder = getVideoJSONDecoder()
let responseResult: [Video] = try decoder.decode([Video].self, from: data)
self.videoList = responseResult
}
func getSocialIDForAll() async throws -> [String: String?] {
var socialList: [String: String?] = [:]
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: (String, String?).self) { group in
for video in self.videoList {
group.addTask {
return (video.id, try await video.uploadedUser.getSocialId())
}
}
for try await (userId, socialId) in group {
socialList[userId] = socialId
}
}
return socialList
}
}
Now, I wish to fill in the socialID
field for the User
struct, which I must obtain from another API using each user's ID. the response looks like this for each user:
{
id: "aaaa",
name: "User1",
social_id: "user_1_social_id",
}
Right now the only viable way to get the information seems to be using withThrowingTaskGroup()
and call getSocialID()
for each user, which I am using right now, then I can return a dictionary that contains all the socialID
information for each user, then the dictionary can be used in SwiftUI views.
But, is there a way for me to fill in the socialID
field in the User
struct without having to use a separate dictionary? It doesn't seem like I can modify the User
struct in each Video
inside videoList
once the JSON decoder initializes the list of videos.
CodePudding user response:
You are correct that you can't modify the structs once they are initialized, because all of their properties are let
variables; however, you can modify the videoList
in VideoViewModel
, allowing you to dispense with the Dictionary
.
@MainActor
class VideoViewModel: ObservableObject {
@Published var videoList: [Video]
func getVideos() async {
// code simplified
let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared.data(for: videoApiRequest)
let decoder = getVideoJSONDecoder()
let responseResult: [Video] = try decoder.decode([Video].self, from: data)
self.videoList = responseResult
}
private func updatedWithSocialID(_ user: User) async throws -> User {
return User(id: user.id, name: user.name, socialID: try await user.getSocialID())
}
private func updateWithSocialID(_ video: inout Video) async throws {
video = Video(id: video.id, title: video.title, uploadUser: try await updatedWithSocialID(video.uploadUser))
}
func setSocialIDForAll() async throws {
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: Void.self) { group in
for i in self.videoList.indices {
group.addTask {
try await self.updateWithSocialID(&self.videoList[i])
}
}
try await group.waitForAll()
}
}
}
If you are able (and willing) to make uploadUser
and socialID
be mutable by changing them to var
, you could avoid making new ones by altering them in place.
CodePudding user response:
Using a view model object is not standard for SwiftUI, it's more of a UIKit design pattern but actually using built-in child view controllers was better. SwiftUI is designed around using value types to prevent the consistency errors typical for objects so if you use objects then you will still get those problems. The View struct is designed to be the primary encapsulation mechanism so you'll have more success using the View struct and its property wrappers.
So to solve your use case, you can use the @State
property wrapper, which gives the View struct (which has value semantics) reference type semantics like an object would, use this to hold the data that has a lifetime matching the View on screen. For the download, you can use async/await via the task(id:)
modifier. This will run the task when the view appears and cancel and restart it when the id
param changes. Using these 2 features together you can do:
.task(id: videoID) { newVideoID in
socials = await Social.getInfo(videoID: newViewID)
}
The parent View
should have a task that got the video infos.