One of the most sad place C Builder-CodePudding

If you want to use c + + 11, can only use a 64 - bit compiled, if original 32-bit, cannot use, unexpectedly, cbuilder even compiler now, no unified, 32-bit compiler or old, new, with a clang

CodePudding user response:

Seems to support the 10.3, c + + 17,

CodePudding user response:

32-bit compiler choose clang 11 or Borland c + + compiler options here:

C + + Compiler - & gt; The Classic Compiler - & gt; The Use of 'classic' Borland compiler, 32 - bit Windows platform only:
If you choose the true, the use of past Borland compiler, this is the default option of 32-bit compiler
If you choose the false, use the new clang compiler, support for c + + 11

CodePudding user response:

refer to the second floor ybchen response:

32-bit compiler choose clang 11 or Borland c + + compiler options here:

C + + Compiler - & gt; The Classic Compiler - & gt; The Use of 'classic' Borland compiler, 32 - bit Windows platform only:
If you choose the true, the use of past Borland compiler, this is the default option of 32-bit compiler
If you choose the false, use the new clang compiler, support for c + + 11

CodePudding user response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, can stuck in edit mode

CodePudding user response:

Old cat is silly cat...

CodePudding user response:

reference 4 floor vc_dreamver response:

choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

CodePudding user response:

refer to 6th floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 4th floor vc_dreamver response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

Clang/LLVM claiming compilation speed is three times the GCC...

CodePudding user response:

refer to 7th floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: refer to the sixth floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 4th floor vc_dreamver response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

Clang/LLVM claiming compilation speed is three times the GCC...

Clang is soon... Used, but the BCB in it, not necessarily,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the eighth floor ccrun response:

CodePudding user response:

references 9 f zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 7th floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: refer to the sixth floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 4th floor vc_dreamver response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

Clang/LLVM claiming compilation speed is three times the GCC...

Clang is soon... Used, but the BCB in it, not necessarily.

Can only say that of real-time syntax check this task is not fast enough...

CodePudding user response:

11 references DelphiGuy response:

Quote: references 9 f zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 7th floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: refer to the sixth floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 4th floor vc_dreamver response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

Clang/LLVM claiming compilation speed is three times the GCC...

Clang is soon... Used, but the BCB in it, not necessarily.

Can only say that of real-time syntax check this task is not fast enough...

C + + Builder, mainly is no cow, so ha ha ha

CodePudding user response:

reference 13 floor zdhsoft reply:

Quote: reference 11 floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: references 9 floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 7th floor DelphiGuy response:

Quote: refer to the sixth floor zdhsoft response:

Quote: refer to 4th floor vc_dreamver response:

Choose CLang, Calder uh-uh, in edit mode can be jammed

c + + Builder now no cattle people, these compilers, all make uncertain,

Clang/LLVM claiming compilation speed is three times the GCC...

Clang is soon... Used, but the BCB in it, not necessarily.

Can only say that of real-time syntax check this task is not fast enough...

C + + Builder, mainly is no cow, so ha ha ha

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull