I would like to call a template function with no arguments for each type in a tuple. The code below shows exactly what the intention is.
My solution involves making a dummy instance of DataGroup()
. I'd like to avoid this, as the types may not have a default constructor.
I've attempted to use std::declval<DataGroup>()
instead, this results in
'std::declval': Symbol involving type with internal linkage not defined
(in msvc).
#pragma once
#include <tuple>
template<typename T>
void do_something_based_on_the_type()
{
// ...
}
template<template <typename...> typename Tuple, typename... Ts>
void do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple(Tuple<Ts...>)
{
(do_something_based_on_the_type<Ts>(), ...);
}
void some_code()
{
struct Dataset1 {};
struct Dataset2 {};
struct Dataset3 {};
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple(DataGroup()); // -> ugly? requires a dummy instantiation of the tuple
}
My preferred solution, based on two of the answers together:
namespace internal
{
template<template <typename...> typename Tuple, typename TemplateFunc, typename... Ts>
void call_per_type_in_tuple(std::type_identity<Tuple<Ts...>>, TemplateFunc f)
{
(f.template operator () < Ts > (), ...);
}
}
template<typename Tuple, typename TemplateFunc>
void call_foreach_tuple_type(TemplateFunc f)
{
internal::call_per_type_in_tuple(std::type_identity<Tuple>(), std::forward<TemplateFunc>(f));
}
void example()
{
struct Dataset1 {};
struct Dataset2 {};
struct Dataset3 {};
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
call_foreach_tuple_type<DataGroup>([]<typename T>()
{
// ...
});
}
CodePudding user response:
You can pass in std::type_identity
which is always default-constructible
#include <type_traits>
template<template <typename...> typename Tuple, typename... Ts>
void do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple(std::type_identity<Tuple<Ts...>>)
{
(do_something_based_on_the_type<Ts>(), ...);
}
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple(std::type_identity<DataGroup>());
CodePudding user response:
Variant with class template specialization:
#include <tuple>
template<typename T>
void do_something_based_on_the_type()
{
// ...
}
template<typename x_Tuple>
class t_ForEachItem;
template<typename... x_Items>
class t_ForEachItem<::std::tuple<x_Items...>>
{
public: static void
Do(){ (do_something_based_on_the_type<x_Items>(), ...); }
};
void some_code()
{
struct Dataset1 {};
struct Dataset2 {};
struct Dataset3 {};
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
t_ForEachItem<DataGroup>::Do();
}
It can also be used with a function call:
template<typename x_Tuple>
void do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple()
{
t_ForEachItem<x_Tuple>::Do();
}
...
do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple<DataGroup>();
Generic variant:
#include <tuple>
template<typename x_Tuple>
class t_ForEachItem;
template<typename... x_Items>
class t_ForEachItem<::std::tuple<x_Items...>>
{
public: template<typename x_Fun> static void
Do(x_Fun fun){ (fun.template operator ()<x_Items>(), ...); }
};
void some_code()
{
struct Dataset1 {};
struct Dataset2 {};
struct Dataset3 {};
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
t_ForEachItem<DataGroup>::Do([]<typename T>(){});
}
CodePudding user response:
My solution is to use a helper function for type deduction. This helper function will take a pointer to a DataGroup instance, and use it to deduce the types in the tuple.
template<typename T>
void do_something_based_on_the_type()
{
// ...
}
template<typename T>
void do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple_helper(T* dataGroup)
{
std::apply([](auto&&... args){ (do_something_based_on_the_type<decltype(args)>(), ...); }, *dataGroup);
}
void some_code()
{
struct Dataset1 {};
struct Dataset2 {};
struct Dataset3 {};
using DataGroup = std::tuple<Dataset1, Dataset2, Dataset3>;
DataGroup dataGroup;
do_something_based_on_the_types_in_a_tuple_helper(&dataGroup);
}