Home > Back-end > C Builder what famous software development? Compared with that of Qt?
C Builder what famous software development? Compared with that of Qt?
Time：11-04
I used c + + Builder20 years, want to start a software project for a long time, recently selection tool, on the Qt, CB6, swing between c # + VC,
A lot of famous written in Qt software (https://blog.csdn.net/tianlang3659/article/details/84832338), including 3 dslicer, Qt Creator, Skype, Mathematica, WPS Office,
But, what are the famous software developed with c + + Builder? https://www.embarcadero.com/case-study
https://www.embarcadero.com/case-study/busicom-case-study BUSICOM Each retail store can update to the latest version at any time the c + + Builder driving the speedy development of a POS register
So, look from the successful cases of contrast, c + + builder is far inferior to Qt, have a little regret not having to learn Qt,
CodePudding user response:
The most is not the Windows platform software, in the platform, Qt is preferred, the Windows platform, vc, Delphi, c + + builder, Qt, c # is optional, two is don't worry about Microsoft's daughter is married, the other three have their own advantages, Delphi and cb, a large number of database management information system, is used to quickly build small and medium-sized enterprises are vc and Qt can, of course, Delphi and cb development also has a lot of common software, I open the computer to send a link, Windows of the most famous software, such as photoshop, also did not use Qt, so proves nothing,
CodePudding user response:
Worldwide, the Qt books so little, also shows a problem, just because of the use of open source and Linux platforms Qt, over the years in domestic is widely used in military industry companies, is also a good thing, after all, open source, is not as expensive as RAD (Delphi, cb).
CodePudding user response:
Worldwide, the Qt books so little, also shows a problem, just because of the use of open source and Linux platforms Qt, over the years in domestic is widely used in military industry companies, is also a good thing, after all, open source, is not as expensive as RAD (Delphi, cb).
CodePudding user response:
CodePudding user response:
Delphi, CB, Qt development for 20 years, have their own advantages, hope in the future can appear a unify various platforms (Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, Android, etc.), river's lake development tools and libraries, set all kinds of advantages, make Photoshop, QQ, thunderbolt, WeChat software is to use it, that is a happy, Qt personal feeling is unlikely, RAD because not open source tools, FMX is unlikely, Microsoft's not fantasy, the future is it possible to have a look at Google framework (can't at home, unless countries enterprise cooperation),
Good Quality Applications Built With CppBuilder https://delphi.fandom.com/wiki/Good_Quality_Applications_Built_With_CppBuilder
Good Quality Applications Built With Delphi https://delphi.fandom.com/wiki/Good_Quality_Applications_Built_With_Delphi
CodePudding user response:
Skype Linux version is written in Qt UI, Windows version is written in Delphi UI, Skype is one of the authors of the Toivo Annus, was also the Qt scolded 1: The The original internal alpha version of The user interface (UI) was built in QT and we hoped to do what platforms at same take, or The result looked like crap , our progress seemed missile and we ditched The QT about 2 up before The public beta release. Delphi was feature because our first senior UI developer was very skilled at Delphi fit (a dozen other languages - environments) and we saw D as most productive, fastest and efficient way to build our app given our team/lead developer skills and also getting very good UX on MSWin platform.
