Home > Back-end >  Now there are people using delphi7
Now there are people using delphi7

Time:11-11

Due to haven't log on BBS for four or five years, he has been in the bottom hole with XP + delphi7, didn't pay attention to the outside world, what is your major now, is already in other higher version? Delphi7 behind the development of times already?

I need to buy a new computer to install 64 - bit Windows 10? I though it is old but I don't want to be eliminated

CodePudding user response:

Suggested that Windows 7 64 - bit, D7 or Xe7, more stable, don't use win10, question is more,

CodePudding user response:

Still eat their D7

CodePudding user response:

Currently use D2010 occasionally write tools, with a couple of years ago, also too lazy to change, there are going to use xe app development exactly how ability, never begin,

CodePudding user response:

Intellect D7 months, personal feel very good, 64 basic Windows 7 will be a problem, but is still good XP

CodePudding user response:

To buy a new computer to the other party to installed Windows 7, otherwise there are enough for you,
Xp is mainly the new graphics driver does not support, as well as memory limits the maximum, in short in Windows 7

CodePudding user response:

Thank you for the reply

CodePudding user response:

Intel 8 series motherboard should support the XP, AMD A85/A88 series motherboard can also be installed, in addition, XP also has a 64 - bit version, but for no motherboard driver problem, I also want to have been using it, even don't want to use Windows 7,

CodePudding user response:

D7 works, has been using, high efficiency,

CodePudding user response:

D7 + XP is classic
But now the company need, upgrade, Windows 7 + XE2

CodePudding user response:

Windows 7 64 can be used completely, has been using

CodePudding user response:

I am the D7, I installed on your computer WIN10 XP virtual machine,

CodePudding user response:

I am now Windows 7 32 bit, D7, use good

CodePudding user response:

Still use, D7 + D14

CodePudding user response:

XP and Windows 7 with D7,
His small procedures, for private use,

CodePudding user response:

The
reference 13 floor yellowlongriver reply:
is still in use, D7 + D14

CodePudding user response:

How XE7 development APP, and when the borland skills?

CodePudding user response:

D7 or XE should be used?
Under the old familiar to recommend?

CodePudding user response:

Conventional software have been use D7,
Xe often used once,

CodePudding user response:

Personal D7 still feeling good enough is good, don't get some spent tiger want things! Focused on line!

CodePudding user response:

I have been using Delphi 7, solve the daily work

CodePudding user response:

I work with software developed on the D7 under Windows 7, normal,

CodePudding user response:

Small rapid development with D7
To use unicode and hope small volume with D2009
Be ignoring volume using powerful function with XE2

CodePudding user response:

Now win10 + + ehlib8.2.017 delphi2010 feel very stable,
But I didn't expect is that there are still using XP?

CodePudding user response:

Virtual machine XP will fill...

CodePudding user response:

Just saw a bunch of query component and a datasource in the interface,
Good tired!

CodePudding user response:

Ah, all process is beginning, pr functions are fn,
This project has nothing to do with Delphi

CodePudding user response:

Now new Intel CPU does not support Windows 7 already seven generations, have to use win10, don't know D7 + win10 line not line?

CodePudding user response:

In 2003 with D7, has been used now, mainly enters sells saves the software development

CodePudding user response:

With D7 quote a name,

CodePudding user response:

Long ago with d5 - d7, then mainly in c #, and until recently there is a small project with Delphi, and then a Delphi under XE 10.2 rather easy to use, d7 does not support unicode and that kind of trouble

CodePudding user response:

reference 16 floor dragonhux response:
XE7 development APP, and when the borland skills?


Is not recommended, and develop native android APP application using eclipse or android studio of good, IOS use oc or swift, and the cross-platform framework can't in-depth mining performance, can also use it to develop web applications

CodePudding user response:

Don't say delphi7, a few days ago I still see some BBS someone with VFP6.0, can better than VFP6.0 delphi7, ha, ha, ha

CodePudding user response:

references in autumn the leaves of 32 floor response:
let alone delphi7, a few days ago I still see some BBS someone with VFP6.0, can better than VFP6.0 delphi7, ha, ha, ha


Foxpro foxbase when it was quite a fire

CodePudding user response:

references in autumn the leaves of 32 floor response:
let alone delphi7, a few days ago I still see some BBS someone with VFP6.0, can better than VFP6.0 delphi7, ha, ha, ha


You don't still use PB

CodePudding user response:

reference 34 building early play big play nuclear war reply:
Quote: reference 32 floor of autumn leaves response:

Don't say delphi7, a few days ago I still see some BBS someone with VFP6.0, can better than VFP6.0 delphi7, ha, ha, ha


You don't still use PB

Yes, at least PB are new versions, haha
VFP6.0 is really old, ha ha

CodePudding user response:

No great progress after PB buyout by SAP? Or interpretive execution? Support 64 bit? Really don't know...

CodePudding user response:

D7 writing background of SOCKET is absolutely no problem, I still use D6

CodePudding user response:

The front of the ANDROID

CodePudding user response:

Delphi7, have to have been made

CodePudding user response:

Novice, small programming is ok

CodePudding user response:

For many years without programming, now use win10 + 64, rad studio10.3 feel good difficult, vclskin businessskin control download, compile all pass, is it not compatible?

CodePudding user response:

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull
  • Related