CodePudding user response:
Can, Qt than Delphi worksCodePudding user response:
Compatible or not depends on who and ratio, and vc6 ratio must be suitable, and Delphi, c + + Builder ratio is notSince it was developed with Delphi, upgraded to high version (at least xe2 +), based on FMX framework can easily design a gorgeous interface, there are also many other aspects, FireDAC database schema support almost all of the DBMS, and UniDAC this super evils is not need to install the corresponding database client also do not need the odbc, ado connection can be directly connected to the db server components,
Qt database support is limited, see: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sql-driver.html#:~:text=The%20table%20below%20lists%20the%20drivers%20included%20with, Call % 20 20 driver interface % % 20 more 20% 205% % 20 rows % 20 note no ms SQL server, want to use it only in a very old odbc connection, and architectural design and backwardness of Qt, plug-in, add or remove a database driver to recompile Qt ~ ~ ~
CodePudding user response:
In QT is better, more large domestic PC software using QT, c + + builder abroad with moreCut the QT for his later career development is better, or c # will be better
CodePudding user response:
If you want to have been engaged in this line, suggested to use c #, however, the domestic market prospect is not good, c #If you want to change the game later, more options, use qt, need qt companies more than the c # development of company,
CodePudding user response:
Do ERP or Delphi is most suitable for, as for the interface beautification plug-in very muchCodePudding user response:
Do interface c #, c/c + + to do core, easy
CodePudding user response: