I am a Gopher Noob. I ran into this question recently regarding implementing priority queues in Golang. I went through https://pkg.go.dev/container/[email protected] for implementing a priority queue. All one has to do is implement the heap.Interface for the container. Its straightforward enough and i have no questions about that.
My question though is this: I need two priority queues. One is a minimum and maximum priority queue. In Java, this is quiet easy is initialize. I just have to change the comparator during initialization and thats it. In golang, I simply have to change the Less method in sort.Interface which is fine. However, I am not interested in writing redundant code and i am looking for cleaner way to create both priority queues.
Here is an example for what i am looking to do:
// A PriorityQueue1
type PriorityQueue1 []*Item
// Implement all the following methods for the min Prioirity queue
func (pq PriorityQueue1) Len() int { return len(pq) }
func (pq PriorityQueue1) Less(i, j int) bool {
// We want Pop to give us the highest, not lowest, priority so we use greater than here.
return pq[i].priority > pq[j].priority
}
func (pq PriorityQueue1) Swap(i, j int) {
//Swap
}
func (pq *PriorityQueue1) Push(x interface{}) {
//Define push logic
}
func (pq *PriorityQueue1) Pop() interface{} {
//Define pop logic
}
Now, I define the maximum priority queue (**everything is the same except Less**), which goes like this..
// A PriorityQueue2
type PriorityQueue2 []*Item
// Implement all the following methods for the max Prioirity queue
func (pq PriorityQueue2) Len() int { return len(pq) }
func (pq PriorityQueue2) Less(i, j int) bool {
return **pq[i].priority < pq[j].priority** // Thats it. One line change..
}
func (pq PriorityQueue2) Swap(i, j int) {
//Swap
}
func (pq *PriorityQueue2) Push(x interface{}) {
//Define push logic
}
func (pq *PriorityQueue2) Pop() interface{} {
//Define pop logic
}
Now why would i have to go through this ordeal of rewriting almost the same methods as that of the min queue for a one line change in Less. I am looking to reduce the boilerplate and i am wondering about what is the cleanest and concise way to go about solving this question. I am also not interested in using any third party libraries (but i am interested in its logic if there is one which provides a clean wrapper).
Please provide some inputs. Thanks..
CodePudding user response:
You can inject the function as a dependency to the constructor for the Priority Queue struct.
It should work as follows:
type Item int
type PriorityQueue []Item
var lesser LessFunction
func GetPriorityQueue(l LessFunction) PriorityQueue {
lesser = l
return []Item{}
}
type LessFunction func(i, j int) bool
func (pq PriorityQueue) Less(i, j int) bool {
return lesser(i, j)
}
Use this in code as follows:
q := GetPriorityQueue(func(i, j int) bool { return i < j })
Please note:
There are multiple ways you can tackle this apart from what I have shown. This shows the similarity to Java's lambda functions.