I have two queries that create two separate tables, pulling on several foreign keys.
Simplified and using retail food as an example, Table 1 looks like this:
Transaction ID | City | Store | Item | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
12320 | Boston | Joe's Shop | 12305 | Banana |
12321 | LA | Bob's Market | 12306 | Apple |
12322 | NY | Suzy's Corner Store | 12307 | Strawberry |
Table 2 looks like this:
Transaction ID | City | Item | Description |
---|---|---|---|
12323 | SF | 12308 | Pineapple |
12324 | Houston | 12306 | Apple |
12325 | Miami | 12307 | Strawberry |
Essentially, Table 2 contains transactions that do not have a store, and as such are treated differently in our company (and reported on separately). However, I was wondering how can I incorporate both tables to achieve something like this? I am getting stuck since the data pull for each table comes from different places, since in this example, transactions sold without a store get classified completely differently.
Transaction ID | City | Store | Item | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
12320 | Boston | Joe's Shop | 12305 | Banana |
12321 | LA | Bob's Market | 12306 | Apple |
12322 | NY | Suzy's Corner Store | 12307 | Strawberry |
12323 | SF | No Store | 12308 | Pineapple |
12324 | Houston | No Store | 12307 | Apple |
12325 | Miami | No Store | 12307 | Strawberry |
Thank you in advance for your help!
CodePudding user response:
In SQL this is called a UNION. You can union two sets if they have the same columns, such as:
select trans_id, city, store, item, description from table1
union
select trans_id, city, 'No Store' as store, item, description from table2