I'm very often fiddling with cycle and they're almost the same, I think you can simplify a lot of code if you have one template.
// the blocks can be different, but the number is known before compilation
const int block_1 = 10,
block_2 = 4,
block_3 = 6,
block_4 = 3;
Basically all cycles are like this
the cycle can be like this
for (int i = 1; i < block_1 - 1; i) {
}
or this
for (int i = 1; i < block_1 - 1; i) {
for (int k = 1; k < block_2 - 1; k) {
}
}
or this
for (int i = 1; i < block_1 - 1; i) {
for (int k = 1; k < block_2 - 1; k) {
for (int j = 1; j < block_3 - 1; j) {
}
}
}
The number of cycle within a cycle can be a lot, but they are similar.
I think that if I use a template instead of loops all the time, would it be more convenient or not, but maybe I shouldn't and you will dissuade me from doing it.
Ideally I would like a template like this
for_funk(block_1, block_2, block_3) {
// Here I write the code that will be inside the three loops block_1, block_2, block_3
}
Maybe this will help https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2374r4.html
CodePudding user response:
Yes, you can compose iota_view
and cartesian_product_view
to get nested indexes in C 23
constexpr inline auto for_funk = [](auto... index) {
return std::views::cartesian_product(std::views::iota(1, index-1)...);
};
const int block_1 = 10,
block_2 = 4,
block_3 = 6,
block_4 = 3;
for (auto [i, j, k, w] : for_funk(block_1, block_2, block_3, block_4))
// use i, j, k, w