Ask the BBS, I am a confused,
I, in the enterprise information start with years, since I hired in 2006, the enterprise information construction is not stopped, 08 companies began on SAP ERP, then based on SAP building basic covers people, goods, content, production, supply and sales business, some basic business management is to support, especially for the business, financial management integration provides a larger support, because is based on the reason of SAP, whether we in the IT staff failure analysis solution, or data tracking search, can be more smooth,
Until 2013, IT replaced an eldest brother, began to abandon the SAP, and the need to pay every year a large number of operational costs (150 w) and receive substantial technical support on the grounds that the company high-level expounds the SAP a variety of reasons, at the same time, beginning with some of the more important new application project management class, such as budget management, asset management, warehouse management, production control application, all from the SAP, despite the many technical personnel do not support and recognition, but due to system problem, the boss said what is what, and, if you don't agree with, and do not approve of the boss is a lot of,
This is not to want to describe the key issues, although is not the key issue is based on the SAP building applications, but my personal view, all new application later, no unified technical requirements, SAP was based on a reduction in the number of the chimney and the size of the island, which increases too many chimneys and island now, and the quality of the construction application level is very low, our department is now company big boss criticized for diversification, the construction of fragmentation, management can't together, mutual understanding between data, big boss want to see what data is basically can't see,
My question now is that there is no uniform technical standard, specification and are not similar to SAP this development, business integration technology platform, really achieve synergy between the business and achieve the possibility of communication between data, have how old? If the pursuit is an enterprise integration, communication, information exactly how to do?

CodePudding user response:

I is also a information on a company to do for a long time, since 96 the informatization construction, the company is research and development of ERP software, all of the management system based on a set of platform architecture; Now run to ERP software (don't), a state-owned do if technology with the development of language, but all data management system are in a server or a database is to say, your company can check directly, after all is not involved in the outsourcing of security problems, if not a, that is about to build interface, the individual thinks, for reference only,

CodePudding user response:

reference 1st floor qq_34785758 response:

I is also a information on a company to do for a long time, since 96 the informatization construction, the company is research and development of ERP software, all of the management system based on a set of platform architecture; Now run to ERP software (don't), a state-owned do if technology with the development of language, but all data management system are in a server or a database is to say, your company can check directly, after all is not involved in the outsourcing of security problems, if not a, that is about to build interface, the individual thinks, for reference only.

Don't mention the interface... An interface, the docking, I want to vomit...
On the one hand, we build the system, the technical level, the direct docking database has...
On the other hand, often is the unmovable, that can't change...

CodePudding user response:

BI is good for data integration,

CodePudding user response:

my question is now, no unified technical standard, specification and are not similar to SAP this development, business integration technology platform, really achieve synergy between the business and achieve the possibility of communication between data, have how old? If the pursuit is an enterprise integration, communication, information exactly how to do?

Foreign software, SAP is 150 w, really too expensive, you should just make a phone call to the service, reflect the problems, and then to solve, such as equal to be pinched nose informatization manufacturers, not endowment department, information department is the company's cost centers, cost center need continuous compression cost, information department is a department, service for profit,

New manager on system natural have his reason,

CodePudding user response:

reference 4 floor fangtaohbjjxy response:

my question is now, no unified technical standard, specification and are not similar to SAP this development, business integration technology platform, really achieve synergy between the business and achieve the possibility of communication between data, have how old? If the pursuit is an enterprise integration, communication, information exactly how to do?

Foreign software, SAP is 150 w, really too expensive, you should just make a phone call to the service, reflect the problems, and then to solve, such as equal to be pinched nose informatization manufacturers, not endowment department, information department is the company's cost centers, cost center need continuous compression cost, information department is a department, service for profit,

New manager on system natural have his reason,

the problem is that you can abandon SAP, you can choose other... At the very least choose high quality construction technology or implement unit... ah

CodePudding user response:

The

reference 3 floor LenGriIT response:

BI is good for data integration,

for the integration of the business logic?

CodePudding user response:

Current direction is more, kenda China on business, the major center of abstracting and alone make it an independent service, behind can be a specific one small system;
Call each other between services and service interface technology, the complexity of the interface, if not the construction of the PaaS platform, basically cost in addition to BAT the Internet giant, no big companies can carry live, main problems, a long way to go,

CodePudding user response:

SAP the bottom is very good, should maintain cost is too high, if is a manufacturing, can consider to do data warehouse, to ease the scattered data, BI what can, soft community look at their business case to sail, to see whether there are similar

CodePudding user response:

This is the underlying process problem, the business process is not smooth, do not take the nature of tools

CodePudding user response:

Form the information isolated island, because you have no good planning, and it doesn't matter, have unified technology platform all business systems use the same company product is not realistic

CodePudding user response:

Enterprise becoming an information based society development to a certain extent, if the original design is not science, a variety of software integration, to the next link, data integration, BI,,, to solve the problem of data island,,,

CodePudding user response:

I think that form the basis for the most basic platform, and then the basic data from various business system platform, so can reduce a lot of island problem, now a lot of the information is step by step walk, technology and constantly updated, the concept has been updated, it's hard to do strong planning, so the formation of these problems are very normal,

CodePudding user response:

Take the process, should be in accordance with the enterprise business process of enterprise information and requirements to do, but the average company will consider already bought with ERP, business process make the appropriate changes to itself; This changes the size of the size, determines the existing processes is enterprise's optimal process, your boss should be in the optimization of enterprise management system and process, not only from the perspective of the IT department,

CodePudding user response:

"Big wang, 2019," from the situation as you describe, could enterprises before the change involves multiple departments software, not the existing workflow comb out, best of old and new system can work in parallel for a period of time,

CodePudding user response:

To learn, just to the enterprise is responsible for the information construction, as far as I'm a man,,, but we are a blank, can plan ahead, at least to avoid each dry,

CodePudding user response:

refer to 17th floor fanroucn2020 response:

to learn, just to the enterprise is responsible for informatization construction, and then I a person,,, but we are a blank, can plan ahead, at least to avoid each dry,

Are you going to how to develop?

CodePudding user response:

If relatively large scale enterprises, at the beginning of the informatization construction of basic it is a bottom-up approach in construction, because the information department to the enterprise's business is not very familiar with, if not a thorough understanding of business start up information system construction, the ending is built, the system use, unless the unit head for enterprise CIO, and also can't be on paper, must be he personally decided to promote and implement informatization, which is possible to achieve the top-down construction of informatization,
Informationization system should be the core of enterprise assets, the initiative must be master in his own hands, enterprise can't keep the external vendors stuck his neck, once formed, such a situation will be very passive,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the 18th floor big wang 2019 response:

Quote: refer to 17th floor fanroucn2020 response:

To learn, just to the enterprise is responsible for the information construction, as far as I'm a man,,, but we are a blank, can plan ahead, at least to avoid each dry,

Are you going to how to develop?

We are currently headquarters a, several factories, enterprises just started 5 years or so, actually small, so the construction is very practical, now preferred to start building a factory, to transform a network and hardware factory, purchasing the server, and then launched a few core system, such as MES the core of this system,
I'm struggling with the server is bought several entities machine room, or direct purchasing a set of virtualization, because it feels now software vendors for the server configuration is very high, a system to run an application server, openings will be how many CPU, memory, 64 several T drive, because I used is a software company, know the configuration is very high, they want they don't use, in order to avoid the waste of resources, I tend to be virtualized,

CodePudding user response:

reference fanroucn2020 20 floor response:

Quote: wang 2019 references to the 18th floor powers response:

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull