I have an application that stores some configuration options which I'd like to write out to a JSON file.
Simplified version of my app's config/options structs and JSON encoding ...
struct AppOptions: OptionSet, Encodable {
let rawValue: Int
static let optA = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 0)
static let optB = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 1)
static let optC = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 2)
static let all: AppOptions = [.optA, .optB, .optC]
}
struct AppConfig: Encodable {
var configName: String
var options: AppOptions
}
let appCfg = AppConfig(configName: "SomeConfig", options: [ .optA, .optC ])
let encoder = JSONEncoder()
encoder.outputFormatting = [.prettyPrinted, .sortedKeys]
let data = try encoder.encode(appCfg)
print(String(decoding: data, as: UTF8.self) )
// {
// "configName" : "SomeConfig",
// "options" : 5
// }
So although this works the generated JSON file is not particularly user friendly as the options
are just saved as the variables raw value -> "options": 5
.
I'd prefer the encoder to generate more user friendly JSON such that the options are written more like an array of elements, as follows...
{
"configName" : "SomeConfig",
"options" : [ "optA", "optC" ]
}
I am somewhat at a dead-end figuring out how to create the custom encode(to: )
required to achieve this, suggestions or solutions please.
Just for some additional context, I have already got a solution for the decode part to read the config from JSON file into my app, it is just the encode back to a JSON file that I need a solution for.
Code, including decode part ...
struct AppOptions: OptionSet {
let rawValue: Int
static let optA = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 0)
static let optB = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 1)
static let optC = AppOptions(rawValue: 1 << 2)
static let all: AppOptions = [.optA, .optB, .optC]
}
extension AppOptions: Codable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
var container = try decoder.unkeyedContainer()
var result: AppOptions = []
while !container.isAtEnd {
let optionName = try container.decode(String.self)
guard let opt = AppOptions.mapping[optionName] else {
let context = DecodingError.Context(
codingPath: decoder.codingPath,
debugDescription: "Option not recognised: \(optionName)")
throw DecodingError.typeMismatch(String.self, context)
}
result.insert(opt)
}
self = result
}
// func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
// // What to do here?
// }
private static let mapping: [String: AppOptions] = [
"optA" : .optA,
"optB" : .optB,
"optC" : .optC,
"all" : .all
]
}
struct AppConfig: Codable {
var configName: String
var options: AppOptions
}
var json = """
{
"configName": "SomeConfig",
"options": ["optA", "optC"]
}
"""
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
var appCfg = try decoder.decode(AppConfig.self, from: Data(json.utf8))
print(appCfg)
//Correct -> AppConfig(configName: "SomeConfig", options: __lldb_expr_115.AppOptions(rawValue: 5))
let encoder = JSONEncoder()
encoder.outputFormatting = [.prettyPrinted, .sortedKeys]
let data = try encoder.encode(appCfg)
print(String(decoding: data, as: UTF8.self) )
// {
// "configName" : "SomeConfig",
// "options" : 5
// }
// needs to be...
// {
// "configName" : "SomeConfig",
// "options" : [ "optA", "optC" ]
// }
CodePudding user response:
You could do something like this but I'm not sure if you are using an OptionSet the way it's supposed to.
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.unkeyedContainer()
let optionsRaw: [String]
if self == .all {
optionsRaw = ["all"]
} else {
optionsRaw = Self.mapping
.filter { $0.key != "all" }
.compactMap { self.contains($0.value) ? $0.key : nil }
.sorted() // if sorting is important
}
try container.encode(contentsOf: optionsRaw)
}
This handles the all
in a way that only ["all"] is encoded and also sorts the keys in case it's a subset.
CodePudding user response:
Similar to decoding, you get an unkeyed container. And for each of the options in mapping
, you check if it is contained in self
.
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.unkeyedContainer()
for (name, option) in Self.mapping {
if self.contains(option) {
try container.encode(name)
}
}
}
Note that the order isn't maintained. AppConfig(configName: "Foo", options: [.optA, .optB])
could be encoded as ["optB", "optA"]
. It's an "option set", not an option list, after all.