Just learned this book, and now I don't know what direction of Taoism, oneself think QT, MFC or Windows can be, but is not very understand the inside of the trend, and learn what the future will be better, there have been some project, the basis of the study should be no problem, want to seek advice bosses

CodePudding user response:

Can learn qt, compared with the other two is easy to get started

CodePudding user response:

See the individual situation,
Now I am also in learning Qt,
Say my feelings,
1. The Qt is definitely better than the other two to fit in and Qt documentation do very well, this is conducive to learning,
2. Looking at a VC project recently, in the process of watching also know some Windows API, feel a little fan,
3. Have the energy, it is suggested that Qt and Windows both learn, I think learning Windows is helpful to the understanding of Qt, and hard work in the future not contact Windows development, leadership should you use Qt refactoring VC project, for example,

CodePudding user response:

Suggest QT, Linux, and Windows can be used, better than simple MFC

CodePudding user response:

Like you, just finished eating the c + +, ready to learn Qt, primarily for embedded applications, later feel Qt is better, the MFC feel very old things, and the friends before I joked that "MFC==didn't eat rice",

CodePudding user response:

Look at my own way of development, to learn more, basic nobody use of MFC, QT interface development is given priority to, the Linux system programming, network programming, Windows core programming, distributed, high concurrency under the network library and so on all can learn,

CodePudding user response:

Qt for certain, Windows to write driver qt is better than money

CodePudding user response:

If you want to write interface, QT, Boost if you want to write the server-side program, in addition, more practice