I have 2 different Shinnyapps in 2 different directories. And let's assume Shinyapp1's UI and server and Shinnyapp2's UI and server as given. How can I create 1 Shinyapp by combining these 2 different apps without rewriting the code? or if you know any GitHub example for this? Many thanks in advance.
library(shiny)
ui <- navbarPage("Combine 2 Shinyapps",
tabPanel("Shinyapp1"),
tabPanel("Shinyapp2")
)
server <- function(input, output, session) {
}
shinyApp(ui, server)
CodePudding user response:
Here is an example using iframes (an approach I already mentioned in your duplicated earlier question).
In the global part im writing two dummy app.R files which are started in a seperate R process via callr::r_bg
:
library(shiny)
library(callr)
makeDir <- function(dir){
if(!dir.exists(dir)){
dir.create(dir, recursive = TRUE)
}}
lapply(c("app1", "app2"), makeDir)
writeLines(text = 'ui <- fluidPage(p("App 1 content"),
sliderInput("obs", "Number of observations:",
min = 0, max = 1000, value = 500
))
server <- function(input, output, session) {}
shinyApp(ui, server)', con = "app1/app.R")
writeLines(text = 'ui <- fluidPage(p("App 2 content"),
sliderInput("obs", "Number of observations:",
min = 0, max = 100, value = 50
))
server <- function(input, output, session) {}
shinyApp(ui, server)', con = "app2/app.R")
r_bg(function(){
shiny::runApp(
appDir = "app1",
port = 3939,
launch.browser = FALSE,
host = "127.0.0.1"
)}, supervise = TRUE)
r_bg(function(){
shiny::runApp(
appDir = "app2",
port = 4040,
launch.browser = FALSE,
host = "127.0.0.1"
)}, supervise = TRUE)
ui <- navbarPage("Combine 2 Shinyapps",
tabPanel("Shinyapp1", tags$iframe(src="http://127.0.0.1:3939/", height="900vh", width="100%", frameborder="0", scrolling="yes")),
tabPanel("Shinyapp2", tags$iframe(src="http://127.0.0.1:4040/", height="900vh", width="100%", frameborder="0", scrolling="yes"))
)
server <- function(input, output, session) {
}
mainApp <- shinyApp(ui, server)
runApp(mainApp)
Another (better) approach would be to wrap both apps in separate modules with their own name space. This is less computationally intensive (a single R process instead of 3) but it would require to rearrange the code (which is not desired by OP: without rewriting the code
).