Home > Mobile >  Why the layout of holding of structure in memory doesnt matter for serialization/deserialization fun
Why the layout of holding of structure in memory doesnt matter for serialization/deserialization fun

Time:11-29

I am new at C programming. I wanted to comprehend structure of DB to get new expirience in programming and CS. So I started writing and right now I am at third section https://cstack.github.io/db_tutorial/parts/part3.html

Question: So there is snippet of code where OFFSET of field of structure are written

typedef struct {
    
    uint32_t id;
    char username[32];
    char email[255];

} Row;

#define size_of_attribute(Struct, Attribute) sizeof(((Struct*)0)->Attribute)

const uint32_t ID_SIZE = size_of_attribute(Row, id);
const uint32_t USERNAME_SIZE = size_of_attribute(Row, username);
const uint32_t EMAIL_SIZE = size_of_attribute(Row, email);
const uint32_t ID_OFFSET = 0;
const uint32_t USERNAME_OFFSET = ID_OFFSET   ID_SIZE;
const uint32_t EMAIL_OFFSET = USERNAME_OFFSET   USERNAME_SIZE;
const uint32_t ROW_SIZE = ID_SIZE   USERNAME_SIZE   EMAIL_SIZE;

and after that the author wrote serialization function

void serialize_row(Row *source, void *destination){

    memcpy(destination   ID_OFFSET , &(source->id) , ID_SIZE );
    memcpy(destination   USERNAME_OFFSET, &(source->username),USERNAME_SIZE);
    memcpy(destination   EMAIL_OFFSET, &(source->email),EMAIL_SIZE);

    return;
}

But I know that structure can be saved in the RAM not consecutively, because compiler seeks to hold data in the size of power of 2(not only compiler). Anyways, for first element it will work because first element are required to be placed at once,but subsequent fields can be not after first field at once(there can be free spaces). It means that just USERNAME_OFFSET or EMAIL_OFFSET won't work.

Please explain to me that.

I am using Manjaro linux(OS)

gcc(compiler)

gdb(debugger)

CodePudding user response:

In order to serialize/deserialize, all you need to ensure is that there is sufficient space (so data elements aren't over written by each other ) and have the serialize() and deserialize() functions agree on the format. For your example, it could have been:

size_t serialize_row(Row *source, void *dest) {
    return sprintf(dest, "(%s,%d,%s)", source->email, source->id, source->username);
}

int deserialize_row(void *source, Row *dest) {
    int n;  
    n = sscanf(dest, "(%s,%d,%s)", source->email, &source->id, source->username);
    return n == 3;
}

The order doesn't matter, the external form has no bearing on the internal form, and all that is important is managing the buffer & io-sizes. Note, btw, that if source->email or source->name contained a ), it could make this fail, so a more robust example is called for.

CodePudding user response:

Yes, exactly, you are right, and your suspicions are right. There is no guarantee that struct members are consecutive, there may be padding between struct members and the code does not handle that.

Specially for that reason, there exists offsetof macro https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/types/offsetof .

Also, initializing a const with a value of another const is not part of C language, and is supported as an extension. In C, you have to repeat it (or use macros, as they expand).

Also, you should prefer to use size_t, not uint32_t, to represent sizes and indexes.

const size_t ID_OFFSET = offsetof(Row, id);
const size_t USERNAME_OFFSET = offsetof(Row, username);
const size_t EMAIL_OFFSET = offsetof(Row, email);
const size_t ROW_SIZE = sizeof(Row);

compiler seeks to hold data in the size of power of 2(not only compiler)

Hm, it's not always size of 2, it's aligned to alignof(type), which varies with type. So char does not need any adjustment, it can be anywhere, but long is usually aligned to 4 bytes. You may want to read http://www.catb.org/esr/structure-packing/ .

CodePudding user response:

Because when you do serialization function, it doesn't matter how will you save it in the file or in the space of HEAP memory. You use as source exact address of each field and just use its size as amount of bytes. When you do deserialization function, it doesn't matter again because you just put all data consecutively and by hand and compiler(if it is necessary) will add padding to the end of the structure.

  • Related