I had this in a script which I believe was working well, but appears to have stopped working:
$testList = @("object 1","object 2","object 3","object 4","object 5")
$counter = 0
$maxSize = 2
$groupedList = $testList | Group-Object { [math]::Floor($counter / $maxSize) }
$groupedList
$groupedList | Measure-Object
Previously Measure-Object would have given me a Count of 3, but now I receive a count of 1.
Why is this no longer working? Is the counter integer not being incremented within the Group-Object command anymore?
CodePudding user response:
I don't think your command ever worked as intended (see the bottom section for details).
Replace:
{ [math]::Floor($counter / $maxSize) }
with:
{ [math]::Floor((Get-Variable -Scope 1 counter).Value / $maxSize) }
in order to ensure that it is the caller's $counter
variable that is updated across invocations of the script block.
Note:
$script:counter
works too, but only if the calling scope is a script's top-level scope.Get-Variable
-Scope 1 counter
explicitly targets the parent scope's definition of$counter
, which is the caller's; for brevity you could omit-Scope 1
, because by default a variable in the closest ancestral scope is returned.Santiago Squarzon suggests another option:
You can define your
$counter
variable as a reference-type object with a.Value
property rather than as an integer, in the simplest form as a hashtable:$counter = @{ Value = 0 }
By virtue of
$counter
now containing an object reference, the child scope in the script block sees the very same object when querying the value of the parent scope's$counter
variable, and can update its.Value
property:{ [math]::Floor($counter.Value / $maxSize) }
The problem is that the script block passed to the (positionally) implied -Property
parameter of Group-Object
runs in a child scope, so that $counter
implicitly creates a block-local variable on every invocation:
That is,
$counter
does not act on the existing variable in the parent scope; it implicitly creates a scope-local copy of the$counter
variable (with the caller's current value), andThis perhaps surprising behavior - a local variable implicitly getting created when (ostensibly) assigning to a variable that exists in an ancestral scope - is discussed in detail in this answer.
On a related note, it may be surprising that such a script block (which includes calculated properties in general) runs in a child scope rather than directly in the caller's to begin with - see GitHub issue #7157
Since your
0
value (copied from the parent-scope variable) that acts as the LHS operand to the division operation/
.On exiting the script block, the local
$counter
variable goes out of scope, and the next invocation starts from scratch.
Thus, in effect, the script block's return value is a fixed 0
, so you'll only ever get one group.
Alternatives to using Group-Object
for "chunking":
Your use of Group-Object
to achieve "chunking" (batching, partitioning, i.e. splitting the input into arrays of fixed size) is elegant, but ultimately inefficient, and it isn't a streaming solution, because all input must be collected up front (neither aspect may matter in a given situation).
It would be great if
Select-Object
directly supported such a feature, which is what GitHub issue #8270 proposes, in the form of a-ReadCount
parameter:# WISHFUL THINKING PS> 1..5 | Select-Object -ReadCount 2 | ForEach-Object { "$_" } 1 2 3 4 5
This answer provides a custom function,
Select-Chunk
, which implements this functionality:# Assumes function Select-Chunk from the linked answer is defined. PS> 1..5 | Select-Chunk -ReadCount 2 | ForEach-Object { "$_" } 1 2 3 4 5