I'm an experienced C# software engineer. I've read the docs and dug through blogs. I suspect the answer is "No, C# doesn't support that", but it's worth asking here:
Suppose I have a JSON data description like this:
{
"data": {
"name": {
"first_name": "Fred",
"last_name": Smith,
},
"address": {
"street": "123 Main Street",
"city": "Anytown",
"state": "CA"
}
}
JSON makes it super easy to create deeply nested data structures. But in order to represent this same data structure in C#, I apparently need to define a separate class for EVERY nested structure, like this:
private class Data {
public Name name { get; set; }
public Address address { get; set; }
}
private class name {
public string first_name { get; set; }
public string last_name { get; set; }
}
private class Address {
public string street { get; set; }
public string city { get; set; }
public string state { get; set; }
}
Is there any way to simplify this code to approach the simplicity of the JSON representation?
CodePudding user response:
You're confounding two different concepts. The JSON you included is defining the object. The C# equivalent of this might look like this, using anonymous types:
new
{
data = new
{
name = new
{
first_name = "Fred",
last_name = "Smith"
},
address = new
{
street = "123 Main Street",
city = "Anytown",
state = "CA"
}
}
}
The C# code you posted defined the types. The equivalent of this would have to be done in a language like TypeScript, since JavaScript doesn't have types yet. The TypeScript would look like this:
type response = {
data: {
name: {
first_name: string,
last_name: string
},
address: {
street: string,
city: string,
state: string
}
}
}
There isn't a simple syntax for declaring a nested C# type like this. You can declare C# classes nested inside of other classes, but that doesn't let you declare the types inline with the property name like TypeScript does.
If you are trying to consume JSON in C#, and don't care to create strong types like the C# code above, you can avoid creating types entirely: Just deserialize the JSON to a dynamic
type, or use a type like JToken
and access its pieces using strings. (Details on how to do this will depend on your serialization framework.)
CodePudding user response:
If the classes are very dependent on each other, for example, name
and addresss
don't make sense outside data
, you can define them inside data
, as nested classes. You do not save code, but it is more encapsulated.
In that case, you do this:
private class Data
{
public Name name { get; set; }
public Address address { get; set; }
#region Nested classes
public class Name
{
public string first_name { get; set; }
public string last_name { get; set; }
}
public class Address
{
public string street { get; set; }
public string city { get; set; }
public string state { get; set; }
}
#endregion
}
With the region you can collapse that code and get your Data
class less overloaded.
CodePudding user response:
If you are looking to build new types that are easier to read just use something like notepadd and make a json object first then use a conversion tool to auto have it made into c# objects.
Here's another way : What you could do is look into Generating an Avro Schema from C#
If you are looking to kind of automate the process you can do the following https://www.thecodebuzz.com/generate-avro-schema-from-json/