I am currently learning C as a student and I have a problem.
Here is my problem :
- I have a class Point (described below)
- I have a class Cartesian and Polar whom inherit from Point
I need to create a function to convert a Cartesian to Polar and a Polar to Cartesian. It needs to be callable directly from Cartesian and Polar or by Point.
Here's roughly what I got right now (it doesn't compile) :
// point.hpp
class Point {
public:
virtual void display(std::ostream&) const = 0;
virtual void convert(Cartesian&) const = 0;
virtual void convert(Polar&) const = 0;
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const Point&);
};
// cartesian.hpp
class Cartesian : public Point {
private:
double _x;
double _y;
public:
Cartesian();
Cartesian(const double, const double);
void display(std::ostream&) const;
void convert(Polar&) const override;
void setX(const double);
void setY(const double);
double getX() const;
double getY() const;
};
// polar.hpp
class Polar : public Point {
private:
double _a;
double _d;
public:
Polar();
Polar(const double, const double);
void display(std::ostream&) const;
void convert(Cartesian&) const override;
void setAngle(const double);
void setDistance(const double);
double getAngle() const;
double getDistance() const;
};
I know the design is crap but I can't change it.
Here's the unit tests to pass :
TEST_CASE ( "TP1_Point::ConversionVersPolaire_V1" ) {
const double x = 12.0;
const double y = 24.0;
const double a = 63.434948;
const double d = 26.832815;
const Cartesian c(x,y);
Polar p;
c.convert(p);
REQUIRE ( p.getAngle() == Approx(a).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( p.getDistance() == Approx(d).epsilon(1e-3) );
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST_CASE ( "TP1_Point::ConversionVersCartesien_V1" ) {
const double a = 12.0;
const double d = 24.0;
const double x = 23.475542;
const double y = 4.9898805;
const Polar p(a,d);
Cartesian c;
p.convert(c);
REQUIRE ( c.getX() == Approx(x).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( c.getY() == Approx(y).epsilon(1e-3) );
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST_CASE ( "TP1_Point::ConversionVirtuel" ) {
const double x = 12.0;
const double y = 24.0;
const double a = 63.434948;
const double d = 26.832815;
Cartesian c(x,y);
Polar p(a,d);
const Point * x1 = &c;
const Point * x2 = &p;
Cartesian c1;
Cartesian c2;
Polar p1;
Polar p2;
x1->convert(c1);
x1->convert(p1);
x2->convert(c2);
x2->convert(p2);
REQUIRE ( c1.getX() == Approx(x).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( c1.getY() == Approx(y).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( c2.getX() == Approx(x).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( c2.getY() == Approx(y).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( p1.getAngle() == Approx(a).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( p1.getDistance() == Approx(d).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( p2.getAngle() == Approx(a).epsilon(1e-3) );
REQUIRE ( p2.getDistance() == Approx(d).epsilon(1e-3) );
}
Thanks in advance for your answers.
CodePudding user response:
In these declarations of member functions
virtual void convert(Cartesian&) const = 0;
virtual void convert(Polar&) const = 0;
the names Cartesian and Polar are not yet declared.
You need either to introduce them as forward declarations before the class Point like
class Cartesian;
class Polar;
or to use elaborated type names in the function declarations like
virtual void convert( class Cartesian& ) const = 0;
virtual void convert( class Polar& ) const = 0;
As the function display is also virtual you should use the keyword override in its declarations in derived classes.
void display(std::ostream&) const override;
Also if one of the function convert is not overridden in one of the derived classes then the corresponding class will be still abstract.