I am trying to hide the table row for user_id. I only want to show the full name, user name, and actions in the table. I tried to remove the code for the user id row, but it affected the other functionalities like the edit and delete.
here is the code:
<form method="post" id="editForm">
<table >
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="col">USER ID</th>
<th scope="col">FULL NAME</th>
<th scope="col">USER NAME</th>
<th scope="col">ACTIONS</th>
</tr>
<?php $a = 0?>
<?php while ($row = mysqli_fetch_array($res)) {
echo "<tr id=".$a .">
<th scope='row' class='row-data'>".$row['user_id']."</th>
<td class='row-data'>".$row['full_name']."</td>
<td class='row-data'>".$row['user_name']."</td>
<td><input type='button'
value='EDIT'
onclick='editUser()'' /></td>
<td><input type='button'
value='DELETE'
onclick='deleteUser()' /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>";
}; ?>
CodePudding user response:
Instead of removing the column, you can set the display style to 'none' for this column
(add style="display:none;"
)
Hence (1) change
<th scope="col">USER ID</th>
to
<th scope="col" style="display:none;">USER ID</th>
and (2) change
<th scope='row' class='row-data'>".$row['user_id']."</th>
to
<th scope='row' class='row-data' style="display:none;">".$row['user_id']."</th>
CodePudding user response:
You could try modifying the editUser()
and deleteUser()
Javascript methods to accept a userId parameter. It would probably clean up some of the code as well on the JS side. Just a suggestion though. That snippet then might look something like this:
<form method="post" id="editForm">
<table >
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="col">FULL NAME</th>
<th scope="col">USER NAME</th>
<th scope="col">ACTIONS</th>
</tr>
<?php $a = 0?>
<?php while ($row = mysqli_fetch_array($res)) {
echo "<tr id='".$a ."'>
<td class='row-data'>".$row['full_name']."</td>
<td class='row-data'>".$row['user_name']."</td>
<td><input type='button'
value='EDIT'
onclick='editUser(".$row['user_id'].")'' /></td>
<td><input type='button'
value='DELETE'
onclick='deleteUser(".$row['user_id'].")' /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>";
}; ?>
Otherwise you could use Ken's solution which would probably work with your existing code.