Now I have a demand. Every five minutes apart, I need to get the data before the 20th minute (similar to the data of the third cycle before this cycle), so I set the map data structure. Is there a better data structure? Every time I read and set the data, I have to write to the file to prevent program restart and data loss. For example,if the first data map is
{-1:"result1",-2:"result2",-3:"result3",-4:"result4"}
, I want to get the last 4 period value which value is result4,and set the new value result5,so the map will change to be
{-1:"result5",-2:"result1",-3:"result2",-4:"result3"}
And again I want to get the last 4 period value which value is result3,and set the new value result6,so the map will change to be
{-1:"result6",-2:"result5",-3:"result1",-4:"result2"}
The code is here:
private static String getAndSaveValue(int a) {
//read the map from file
HashMap<Long,String> resultMap=getMapFromFile();
String value=resultMap.get(-4L);
for(Long i=4L;i>=2;i--){
resultMap.put(Long.parseLong(String.valueOf(i-2*i)),resultMap.get(1-i));
}
resultMap.put(-1L,"result" a);
//save the map to file
saveMapToFile(resultMap);
return value;
}
CodePudding user response:
Based on your requirement, I think LinkedList data structure will be suitable for your requirement:
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
LinkedList<String> ls=new LinkedList<String>();
ls.push("result4");
ls.push("result3");
ls.push("result2");
ls.push("result1");
System.out.println(ls);
ls.push("result5"); //pushing new value
System.out.println("Last value:" ls.pollLast()); //this will return `result4`
System.out.println(ls);
ls.push("result6"); //pushing new value
System.out.println("Last value:" ls.pollLast()); // this will give you `result3`
System.out.println(ls);
}
}
Output:
[result1, result2, result3, result4]
Last value:result4
[result5, result1, result2, result3]
Last value:result3
[result6, result5, result1, result2]
CodePudding user response:
Judging by your example, you need a LIFO data structure which has a bounded size.
There's no bounded general purpose implementation of the Queue
interface in the JDK. Only concurrent implementation could be bounded in size. But if you're not going to use it in a multithreaded environment, it's not the best choice because thread safety doesn't come for free - concurrent collections are slower, and also can create confusing for the reader of your code.
To achieve your goal, I suggest you to use the composition by wrap ArrayDeque
, which is an array-based implementation of the Queue
and performs way better than LinkedList
.
public class BoundQueue<T> {
private Queue<T> queue;
private int limit;
public BoundQueue(int limit) {
this.queue = new ArrayDeque<>(limit);
this.limit = limit;
}
public void offer(T item) {
if (queue.size() == limit) {
queue.poll(); // or throw new IllegalStateException() depending on your needs
}
queue.add(item);
}
public T poll() {
return queue.poll();
}
public boolean isEmpty() {
return queue.isEmpty();
}
}