Let's say that I need to sort a list like:
A=[1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0]
following a ratio between 1 and 0 of 4:1, obtaining so A=[1,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,0]
.
Is that possible?
I tried to use a count
comand in this way:
scheme=[1,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,0]
for k, number in enumerate(scheme):
visited.append(number)
scheme[k] = visited.count(number)/len(scheme)
for z in scheme:
new = sorted(scheme).index(z)
final.append(sorted(que)[new])
But this is not a comfortable approach since scheme
, the guide list, depends strongly on initial list A lenght.
Thank you in advance!
CodePudding user response:
Using simple arithmetic
Assuming the sequence contains only zeroes and ones.
from collections import Counter
def reorder_4_1(seq):
c = Counter(seq)
q1, r1 = divmod(c[1], 4)
diff = q1 - c[0]
if diff > 0:
return [1,1,1,1,0] * c[0] [1] * (diff r1)
else:
return [1,1,1,1,0] * q1 [1] * r1 [0] * (-diff)
print( reorder_4_1([1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0]) )
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]
Using module itertools
Using recipe roundrobin
from the itertools
documentation:
Assuming there are two groups of elements to interleave 4:1
from itertools import cycle, islice
def roundrobin(*iterables):
"roundrobin('ABC', 'D', 'EF') --> A D E B F C"
# Recipe credited to George Sakkis
num_active = len(iterables)
nexts = cycle(iter(it).__next__ for it in iterables)
while num_active:
try:
for next in nexts:
yield next()
except StopIteration:
# Remove the iterator we just exhausted from the cycle.
num_active -= 1
nexts = cycle(islice(nexts, num_active))
def interleave_4_1(a, b):
a = iter(a)
b = iter(b)
return roundrobin(a, a, a, a, b)
print(list( interleave_4_1([1,1,1,1,1,1,1],[0,0,0]) ))
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]
Assuming the sequence is guaranteed to be a list of ones and zeroes
from collections import Counter
from itertools import repeat
# def roundrobin...
def reorder_4_1(seq):
c = Counter(seq)
a = repeat(1, c[1])
b = repeat(0, c[0])
return roundrobin(a, a, a, a, b)
print(list( reorder_4_1([1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0]) ))
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]
CodePudding user response:
Here is a way without collections or itertools, assuming only zeroes and ones and that you want ones first and then zeroes after:
def ratio_sort(x,y,lst):
counter_dict = {1:0,0:0}
for num in lst: # count the amount of ones and zeroes in lst
counter_dict[num] =1
# find how many groups of ones and zeroes we have
one_groups = counter_dict[1]//x
zero_groups = counter_dict[0]//y
new_list = []
for i in range(min(one_groups, zero_groups)): # add ratios of ones and zeroes to new list
new_list.extend(([1]*x) ([0]*y))
counter_dict[1]-=x
counter_dict[0]-=y
new_list.extend(([1]*counter_dict[1]) ([0]*counter_dict[0])) # insert the leftovers
return new_list