I get the Error "no instance of constructor "std::vector<_Ty, _Alloc>::vector [with _Ty=FunctionToUpdate, _Alloc=std::allocator]" matches the argument list". No matter how I change it, it persists, as long I keep it as a class. If I keep it all in just a simple .cpp without class and header it all resolves easily. My .h:
#include <vector>
#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
struct Params
{
std::vector<int> Integers;
std::vector<std::string> Strings;
};
struct FunctionToUpdate
{
int Version;
std::function<void(int, Params)> Function;
Params Parameters;
};
class Error
{
public:
Error();
void testFunctionA(int a, Params p);
void testFunctionB(int a, Params p);
protected:
const static std::vector<FunctionToUpdate> table;
};
Here is my .cpp, please assist me, I can't find the error:
#include "ErrorHandling.h"
Error::Error()
{
for (auto functionToUpdate : table)
{
functionToUpdate.Function(functionToUpdate.Version, functionToUpdate.Parameters);
std::cout << "############################################" << std::endl;
}
std::cout << "Done!" << std::endl;
}
void Error::testFunctionA(int a, Params parameter)
{
//std::cout << "Size Integers: " << parameter.Integers.size() << std::endl;
//std::cout << "Size Strings: " << parameter.Strings.size() << std::endl;
std::cout << a << std::endl;
for (auto& integer : parameter.Integers)
{
std::cout << integer << std::endl;
}
for (auto& integer : parameter.Strings)
{
std::cout << integer << std::endl;
}
}
void Error::testFunctionB(int a, Params parameter)
{
std::cout << a << std::endl;
std::cout << parameter.Integers.at(0) << std::endl;
}
const std::vector<FunctionToUpdate> Error::table
{ // <-- here the Error happens
{ 100, &testFunctionA, { {177}}},
{ 1948, &testFunctionB, { {314}}},
};
int main()
{
Error error;
}
CodePudding user response:
Your code has a few issues
First, the correct initialization of static member
Error::table
would be as follows:const std::vector<FunctionToUpdate> Error::table { { 100, &Error::testFunctionA, { { {177} }, { {"string"} } }}, { 1948, &Error::testFunctionB, { { {314} }, { {"string"} } } } };
Note that the syntax
&Error::testFunctionA
for addressing the member function pointer. Additionally, theParams
has two vectors. One isstd::vector<int>
and the other isstd::vector<std::string>
. In your code, thestd::vector<std::string>
has not been mentioned.
In
FunctionToUpdate
the member function pointer type is wrong. Using typed member function pointer, you could// forward declaration class Error; // member function pointer type using ErrorFunType = void(Error::*)(int, Params); struct FunctionToUpdate { int Version; ErrorFunType Function; Params Parameters; };
Secondly, the call to pointer to the member function in
Error::Error()
is wrong. It needs an (Error
class) instance to call with. For example:for (auto functionToUpdate : table) { (this->*functionToUpdate.Function)( functionToUpdate.Version, functionToUpdate.Parameters ); // or more generic `std::invoke` (since c 17) // std::invoke(functionToUpdate.Function // , this, functionToUpdate.Version // , functionToUpdate.Parameters); // ... }
The above changes will make, your code compiles again!
In case of wondering, how to handle the pointer to member function with std::function
, (one way) to wrap the instance to call the member along with the std::function
type.
Following is the example:
// forward declaration
class Error;
// member function pointer
using ErrorFunType = std::function<void(Error*, int, Params)>;
struct FunctionToUpdate
{
int Version;
ErrorFunType Function;
Params Parameters;
};
now in Error::Error()
Error::Error()
{
for (auto functionToUpdate : table)
{
functionToUpdate.Function(this
, functionToUpdate.Version, functionToUpdate.Parameters);
}
}