Exposure to a structure to com what method-CodePudding

Want to spread structure in the interface is the only member variables that
Use the wizard to add attributes attribute too much how to do ah,,

CodePudding user response:

Simple can provide a method to obtain properties, add an input parameters such as ID, according to the ID variable returns the corresponding attributes

CodePudding user response:

reference 1st floor zzz3265 response:

simple can provide a method to obtain properties, such as ID, add an input parameter based on ID returns the corresponding property variable

Is a method of
There are other
Can not directly exposed in c #

CodePudding user response:

Can't transfer structure, packaged into COM object.

CodePudding user response:

reference akirya reply: 3/f

can't transfer structure, packaged into COM objects.

You don't understand, don't talk nonsense, how can't preach structure

CodePudding user response:

reference 4 floor java_charpnet response:

Quote: reference akirya reply: 3/f

Can't transfer structure, packaged into COM objects.

You don't understand, don't talk nonsense, how can't preach structure

Scripts can't use, out-of-process component can't use,

CodePudding user response:

reference 5 floor akirya reply:

Quote: refer to 4th floor java_charpnet response:

Quote: refer to the third floor akirya response:

Can't transfer structure, packaged into COM objects.

You don't understand, don't talk nonsense, how can't preach structure

Scripts can't use, out-of-process component can't use,

Who and you said process can't use, not try myself, script can actually, a bit more

CodePudding user response:

Packaging COM objects just for automation, direct structure LPC or RPC can even go, is the difference between two points, it is you really are the structure is used to memory blocks is C or C + + object? The second is the so called how much they cost, convenient than directly encapsulation COM objects? Different natural way to different demand and scene, all existing ways for convenience ready-made also have nothing to say,

CodePudding user response:

refer to 7th floor xuddk727 response:

packing COM objects just for automation, direct structure LPC or RPC can even go, is the difference between two points, it is you really are the structure used is the memory block C or C + + object? The second is the so called how much they cost, convenient than directly encapsulation COM objects? Different natural way to different demand and scene, all existing ways for convenience ready-made also have nothing to say,

Completely real things, how to package into a com object, also called cost, is really funny, originally the value the simple things, encapsulating the client side to create a stub

CodePudding user response:

refer to the eighth floor java_charpnet response:

Quote: refer to 7th floor xuddk727 response:

Packaging COM objects just for automation, direct structure LPC or RPC can even go, is the difference between two points, it is you really are the structure is used to memory blocks is C or C + + object? The second is the so called how much they cost, convenient than directly encapsulation COM objects? Different natural way to different demand and scene, all existing ways for convenience ready-made also have nothing to say,

Completely real things, how to package into a com object, also called cost, is really funny, originally the value the simple things, encapsulating the client side to create a stub

in appropriate situations, from the pointer the change for the com object is to increase the cost