In terms of WCAG 2.0 accessibility, is an empty alt-tag equally valid if it's written alt
or alt=""
in the html?
Like this:
<img src="some-image.jpg" alt="">
<img src="some-image.jpg" alt>
Are they both valid for stating decorative images?
Inspecting an image with alt=""
in a browser's DevTools will display alt
, so is it valid to just write alt
in the html?
CodePudding user response:
Both should be treated equally.
According to the HTML Standard:
Empty attribute syntax
Just the attribute name. The value is implicitly the empty string.
CodePudding user response:
They are the same: https://stackoverflow.com/a/44764507/18717610 A screen reader will not read the image with an empty alt attribute.