CanCanCan block question, is the "block" version of a test, the same as a non-block versio-CodePudding

Are these two statements basically the same? If they aren't then what should the second version look like? And what's going on under the covers?

can :index, User, approved: true

can :index, User do |user|
  user.approved?
end

I'm not able to get "block" versions of tests working. Everything else works fine.. but blocks don't work. I'm clearly doing something wrong, so I'm trying to understand. Thanks.

CodePudding user response：

https://gitlab.quints.io/quints/bi_backend/-/blob/pre_production/app/models/payment_system/bank_transfer_requisite.rb#L61

Note that if you pass a block to a can or cannot, the block only executes if an instance of a class is passed to can? or cannot? calls.

If you define a can or cannot with a block and an object is not passed, the check will pass.

Maybe this is answer ?

CodePudding user response：

Rules with blocks are used when an instance is passed to the rule:

can?(:show, User.first)

The index action is special because there's no instance of User to pass to the rule, you are not loading a specific user, but multiple.

So,

can :index, User, approved: true

When the UserController#index action is hit, assuming you have load_and_authorize_resource (or similar in place), it will load in @users all the users with approved: true. If there are no conditions, all users will be loaded. It's straightforward.

Now,

can :index, User do |user|
  user.approved?
end

If a rule has a block and the instance is not passed to it (as I said above), the rule it will always return true as in authorized, BUT no users will be loaded.

More explanations, here.