In my dataset respondents are grouped together and there is data available about their age. I want all the people in the same group to have the value of the oldest person in that group.
So my example data looks like this.
df <- data.frame(groups = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3),
age = c(12, 23, 34, 13, 24, 35, 13, 25, 36),
value = c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9))
> df
groups age value
1 1 12 1
2 1 23 2
3 1 34 3
4 2 13 4
5 2 24 5
6 2 35 6
7 3 13 7
8 3 25 8
9 3 36 9
And I want it to look this this
> df
groups age value new_value
1 1 12 1 3
2 1 23 2 3
3 1 34 3 3
4 2 13 4 6
5 2 24 5 6
6 2 35 6 6
7 3 13 7 9
8 3 25 8 9
9 3 36 9 9
Any idea how to do this with dplyr?
I have tried something like this, but it doesn't work
df %>%
group_by(groups) %>%
mutate(new_value = df$value[which.max(df$age)])
CodePudding user response:
Up front, "never" (okay, almost never) use df$
within a dplyr pipe. In this case, df$value[which.max(df$age)]
is referencing the original data each time, not the grouped data. Inside each group in this dataset, value
is length 3 whereas df$value
is length 9.
The only times I feel it is appropriate to use df$
(referencing the original value of the current dataset) inside a pipe is when it is required to look at pre-pipeline data, in absence of any grouping, reordering, or new variables created outside of the currently-saved (pre-pipeline) version of df
.
dplyr
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(groups) %>%
mutate(new_value = value[which.max(age)]) %>%
ungroup()
# # A tibble: 9 x 4
# groups age value new_value
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 1 12 1 3
# 2 1 23 2 3
# 3 1 34 3 3
# 4 2 13 4 6
# 5 2 24 5 6
# 6 2 35 6 6
# 7 3 13 7 9
# 8 3 25 8 9
# 9 3 36 9 9
data.table
library(data.table)
DT <- as.data.table(df)
DT[, new_value := value[which.max(age)], by = .(groups)]
base R
df$new_value <- ave(seq_len(nrow(df)), df$groups,
FUN = function(i) df$value[i][which.max(df$age[i])])
df
# groups age value new_value
# 1 1 12 1 3
# 2 1 23 2 3
# 3 1 34 3 3
# 4 2 13 4 6
# 5 2 24 5 6
# 6 2 35 6 6
# 7 3 13 7 9
# 8 3 25 8 9
# 9 3 36 9 9
The base R approach seems to be the least-elegant-looking solution. I believe that ave
is the best approach, but it has many limitations, first being that it only works on one value-object (value
) in the absence of others (we need to know age
).