Currently in my code I have a function, that takes various arguments, and a callback object (which is instance of a simple class with a Callback(void) function). This works perfectly fine now, but it clutters code because I have quite a few of these classes, and in most of them their variables are used only by the Callback() function.
I would like to replace the classes with simple function like so:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
template<class T>
class TestClass {
public:
template<typename ...TArgs>
using CallbackFuncType = bool(T &Data, TArgs && ...Args);
TestClass(const T &Data) : data(Data) {}
template<typename ...TArgs>
bool Function(
CallbackFuncType<TArgs...> Callback,
TArgs && ...Args
)
{
return Callback(data,
std::forward<TArgs>(Args)...);
}
private:
const T data;
};
struct DataType {
int valInt;
double valFloat;
std::string ToString()
{
return std::string(
"valInt: " std::to_string(valInt)
"valFloat: " std::to_string(valFloat)
);
}
};
bool CBFunction1(DataType &Data, int Arg0, const std::string &Arg1)
{
std::cout << "Data :" << Data.ToString() << std::endl;
std::cout << "CBFunction1: " <<
"Arg0 : " << Arg0 <<
"Arg1: " << Arg1 <<
std::endl;
return true;
}
bool CBFunction2(DataType &Data, int Arg0, double Arg1, const std::string &Arg2)
{
std::cout << "Data :" << Data.ToString() << std::endl;
std::cout << "CBFunction2: " <<
"Arg0 : " << Arg0 <<
"Arg1: " << Arg0 <<
"Arg2: " << Arg2 <<
std::endl;
return true;
}
int main()
{
DataType data;
data.valInt = 1;
data.valFloat = 1.2;
TestClass<DataType> testObj(data);
std::cout << "test" << std::endl;
std::cout << "call CBFunction1" << std::endl;
bool val1 = testObj.Function(CBFunction1, 11, "test_string");
bool val2 = testObj.Function(CBFunction2, 11, 111.111, "test_string");
return 0;
}
Upon compilation I get the following errors:
1>main.cpp
1>main.cpp(75,24): error C2672: 'TestClass<DataType>::Function': no matching overloaded function found
1>main.cpp(75,64): error C2784: 'bool TestClass<DataType>::Function(bool (__cdecl *)(T &,TArgs &&...),TArgs &&...)': could not deduce template argument for 'bool (__cdecl *)(T &,TArgs &&...)' from 'bool (DataType &,int,const std::string &)'
1> with
1> [
1> T=DataType
1> ]
1>main.cpp(13): message : see declaration of 'TestClass<DataType>::Function'
1>main.cpp(76,24): error C2672: 'TestClass<DataType>::Function': no matching overloaded function found
1>main.cpp(76,73): error C2784: 'bool TestClass<DataType>::Function(bool (__cdecl *)(T &,TArgs &&...),TArgs &&...)': could not deduce template argument for 'bool (__cdecl *)(T &,TArgs &&...)' from 'bool (DataType &,int,double,const std::string &)'
1> with
1> [
1> T=DataType
1> ]
1>main.cpp(13): message : see declaration of 'TestClass<DataType>::Function'
I tried to add type_identity_t to Args, but had no success.
CodePudding user response:
template <typename... TArgs>
bool Function(CallbackFuncType<TArgs...> Callback, TArgs&&... Args)
Have several issues, the main one is that TArgs
should be deduced exactly identically in both place.
Issue with
template <typename... TArgs>
using CallbackFuncType = bool(T& Data, TArgs&&... Args);
is that it can only match function with argument which are (l or r value) reference.
So something like
template <typename... TArgs>
using CallbackFuncType = bool(T&, TArgs...);
template <typename... TArgs, typename... Ts>
bool Function(CallbackFuncType<TArgs...>* Callback, Ts&& ...Args)
{
return Callback(data, std::forward<Ts>(Args)...);
}
would fix the issue, but even simpler (and more generic)
template <typename Func, typename... Ts>
bool Function(Func Callback, Ts&& ...Args)
{
return Callback(data, std::forward<Ts>(Args)...);
}