Below is the sample data. I know how to construct a rank column for each time period but that is not the task. I have a larger data set that has monthly data from 2001 to 2022 but looking to avoid doing this manually. Is there a way to construct a rank column for a range of columns. In this case, it would would be 3 new columns. Each one would rank the values from largest to smallest.
area <- c("Alabama", "Alaska", "Arizona", "Arkansas", "California", "Colorado", "Connecticut", "Delaware")
sept2020 <- c(.120,.125,.130,.110,.095,.045,.131,.029)
oct2020 <- c(.121,.129,.128,.119,.099,.041,.138,.028)
nov2020 <- c(.119,.128,.129,.118,.091,.048,.139,.037)
percent <- data.frame(area,sept2020,oct2020,nov2020)
The desired result would appear as such but with two more rank columns.. for oct2020 and nov2020
area sept2020 rank1
Alabama .120 4
Alaska .125 3
Arizona .130 2
Arkansas .110 5
California .095 6
Colorado .045 7
Connecticut .131 1
Delaware .029 8
CodePudding user response:
1) dplyr Use across
like this:
library(dplyr)
percent %>%
mutate(across(-1, ~ rank(desc(.)), .names = "{.col}_rank"))
giving:
area sept2020 oct2020 nov2020 sept2020_rank oct2020_rank nov2020_rank
1 Alabama 0.120 0.121 0.119 4 4 4
2 Alaska 0.125 0.129 0.128 3 2 3
3 Arizona 0.130 0.128 0.129 2 3 2
4 Arkansas 0.110 0.119 0.118 5 5 5
5 California 0.095 0.099 0.091 6 6 6
6 Colorado 0.045 0.041 0.048 7 7 7
7 Connecticut 0.131 0.138 0.139 1 1 1
8 Delaware 0.029 0.028 0.037 8 8 8
2) Base R A base R solution would be the following. It gives similar output.
Rank <- function(nm, x) rank(-x)
cbind(percent, mapply(Rank, paste0(names(percent)[-1], "_rank"), percent[-1]))
CodePudding user response:
It sounds like you might be looking for the dense_rank function from dplyr
:
percent %>%
mutate(rank1 = dense_rank(desc(sept2020))
And then you could simply repeat that code, using oct2020 and nov2020 in the dense_rank, to create the next two ranking variables.