I'm trying to clear space in .git folder. I was version controlling the images on my site and maxed out my bitbucket space as my .git folder was growing to over 1gb. My solution was to move my images out of my local directory and into an s3 bucket.
I don't really care about the old commits so I was hoping to delete them and start fresh.
I followed this approach: how to delete all commit history in github?
As per the steps in the link:
Checkout
git checkout --orphan latest_branch
Add all the files
git add -A
Commit the changes
git commit -am "commit message"
Delete the branch
git branch -D main
Rename the current branch to main
git branch -m main
Force update your repository
git push -f origin main
Then Finally
git gc -- aggressive -- prune=all
This worked to clear commits from my bitbucket account but the .git folder hasn't changed size it is still 1gb. I thought git gc would clear the old files but it doesn't seem to work.
At this point how can I clear old files from my git folder?
CodePudding user response:
I take it that the real questions here are:
Why didn't the thing I did reduce the size of the .git folder significantly?
What should I have done?
To discover the answer, let's talk about how commits die. To understand that, you need to know how commits can't die. Here's what you need to know:
A branch is merely a name for one commit. So is a tag name.
Every commit has at least one "parent" — except for the very first commit you ever made (the "root" commit) and any "orphan" commits that you may create.
If a commit has a name — that is, a branch name or tag name points to it — it cannot die.
If commit is the parent of a commit that is alive, it cannot die.
Now then. If that's how a commit can't die, how can a commit die? Well, for a commit to die, it would have to be the case that no branch or tag name points to a commit that calls this commit its parent at any depth. In other words, imagine a chain of commit parentage; well, a commit can only die if no chain of commit parentage starting with a branch or tag name reaches it.
Okay, so now let's talk about what you did. You deleted main
, in the hopes that this would cause all existing commits to die. But it seems like they didn't. So let me ask you this: was main
the only branch you had? Because if it wasn't, then all those other branch names still exist, and they are keeping all their parents alive all the way back to the root commit.
Moreover, you've got a remote. So you also have remote-tracking branches that mirror the state of that remote. So in addition to your main
, you've also got an origin/main
. What you did had no effect on that. So that origin/main
is keeping all your commits alive, all the way back to the root commit.
So what you did probably didn't cause any commits to die!
And that would explain why your .git folder didn't get significantly smaller after what you did.
So, to do it correctly the way you did it, you would need to say git branch
to find out what branches you have, and delete each of those branches. Plus, you'd need to say git tag --list
to find out what tags you have, and delete each of those tags.
But even that wouldn't be enough, because what about all the remote-tracking branches you have? To see those, you'd say git branch --remote
. You'd need to delete all those remote branches too! But you can't just delete them; you have to push the deletion. For every remote-tracking branch, you'd need to say git push --delete origin <branchname>
.
Sounds like a lot of work, doesn't it?
And that's why the simplest way to do what you want to do is just to checkout the state of things that you like, which is presumably main
, and then just throw the entire .git folder away. Then say git init
and start all over with a fresh commit. Also throw your remote away and make a fresh remote. Hook the two together with git remote add
, and push your brand new clean repository to the branch new clean remote.