I was trying to swap two arrays using pointers. What I wanted was to swap using a call by reference.
This code I wrote is given below
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void swap(int **a, int **b) {
int *temp = (int*)malloc(5*sizeof(int));
temp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = temp;
}
int main() {
int arr1[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int arr2[] = {6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
swap((int**)&arr1, (int**)&arr2);
for(int i=0; i<5; i ) printf("%d\t", arr1[i]);
printf("\n");
for(int i=0; i<5; i ) printf("%d\t", arr2[i]);
printf("\n");
}
The output of the code is:
6 7 3 4 5
1 2 8 9 10
instead of:
6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5
What did I do wrong?
CodePudding user response:
First of all lets fix your swap function:
void swap(int **pparr1, int **pparr2)
{
int *temp = *pparr1;
*pparr1 = *pparr2;
*pparr2 = temp;
}
This function now swaps the two pointers that parr1
and parr2
are pointing to.
Then lest update the way to call this function:
int *parr1 = arr1; // Make parr1 point to the first element of arr1
int *parr2 = arr2; // Make parr2 point to the first element of arr2
// Swap the two pointers
swap(&parr1, &parr2);
And then we print using the pointers instead of the arrays:
printf("arr1 = [ ");
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; i)
{
printf("%d ", parr1[i]);
}
printf("]\n");
printf("arr2 = [ ");
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 5; i)
{
printf("%d ", parr2[i]);
}
printf("]\n");
This will print the arrays as if they were swapped, but in fact the arrays themselves are not swapped. You can verify by printing using the arrays arr1
and arr2
themselves.
If you want to swap the actual contents of the arrays, you need a loop to actually swap the elements themselves:
// Function to swap two integer values
void swap(int *p1, int *p2)
{
int temp = *p1;
*p1 = *p2;
*p2 = temp;
}
// Function to swap two arrays
void swap_arrays(int *pa1, int *pa2, size_t size)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i)
{
// Swap each separate element of the arrays
swap(&pa1[i], &pa2[i]);
}
}
Call like
swap_arrays(arr1, arr2, 5);
After this the contents of the arrays themselves have been swapped.
CodePudding user response:
swap((int**)&arr1, (int**)&arr2);
It looks like your idea is to have swap
swap the address of arr1
with the address of arr2
. Variables in C, including arrays, do not work this way, and this idea cannot possibly work.
arr1
is a name for the array. It is not the address of the array, nor is it a variable whose value is the address of the array. There is no pointer to the array that can be swapped with a pointer to the array arr2
.
When the compiler processes int arr1[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
, it creates an array of five int
, and then it uses arr1
to refer to that array. Wherever arr1
is used, the compiler creates code that will refer to the array. It does not do this by storing the address of the array in some memory location you can swap with another address. It has ways to access the array using registers and processor instructions set up for that.
In swap((int**)&arr1, (int**)&arr2);
, you take the addresses of arr1
and arr2
and convert them to int **
. The address of arr1
is the address where its contents are. What is at that address in memory is the int
elements, not a pointer. So the int **
type does not make sense for this; the address of arr1
is not the address of an int *
.
The reason you get the output you do is that int
objects are four bytes in your C implementation and int *
objects are eight bytes. So when temp = *a;
attempts to get the int *
that a
should be pointing to, it gets the first eight bytes in arr1
. Then *a = *b;
replaces those eight bytes with the first eight bytes in arr2
. And *b = temp;
replaces the first eight bytes in arr2
with the saved eight bytes from arr1
.
Note that, in these three statements, temp
is used to hold eight bytes from arr1
. The value it was given in int *temp = (int*)malloc(5*sizeof(int));
is lost when temp
is assigned another value in temp = *a;
.
Also note that this behavior you observed in this instance is not specified by the C standard, and different behavior can result in other circumstances, including alignment errors and surprising transformations of the program by compiler optimization.
CodePudding user response:
In this call
swap((int**)&arr1, (int**)&arr2);
the passed pointers point to first elements of the arrays arr1
and arr2
.
So within the function swap
void swap(int **a, int **b) {
int *temp = (int*)malloc(5*sizeof(int));
temp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = temp;
}
dereferencing the pointers like for example
*a
results in reading the first two elements of the array arr1
as a pointer because in your system sizeof( int * )
is equal to 2 * sizeof( int )
.
That is values of first two elements of the arrays are interpreted as values of pointers.
And the obtained output confirms that
6 7 3 4 5
1 2 8 9 10
^^^^^
Moreover the function has a memory leak because at first memory was allocated dynamically and its address was assigned to the pointer temp
and then the pointer was reassigned
int *temp = (int*)malloc(5*sizeof(int));
temp = *a;
So the address of the allocated memory was lost and the memory was not freed.
You can not swap arrays such a way. You need to swap each pair of elements of the arrays.
The function can look for example the following way
void swap( int *a, int *b, size_t n )
{
for ( int *p = a; p != a n; p, b )
{
int temp = *p;
*p = *b;
*b = temp;
}
}
And the function is called like
swap( arr1, arr2, 5 );
A less flexible function can look the following way
void swap( int ( *a )[5], int ( *b )[5] )
{
for ( int *p1 = *a, *p2 = *b; p1 != *a 5; p1, p2 )
{
int temp = *p1;
*p1 = *p2;
*p2 = temp;
}
}
And the function is called like
swap( &arr1, &arr2 );