I have a trait definition that wraps side effects when instantiated like this:
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1(param: Param): F[Param]
}
Where my Param is a case class which itself takes type parameters like this:
final case class Param[F[_]] {
field1: F[String],
field2: F[Int]
)
Now my question is, what does it mean if I change my trait method signature to the following:
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1(param: Param[_]): F[Param[_]]
}
As you can see I'm having a wildcard everywhere I reference the Param case class. Is this a good approach? I do not want to tie my interface to a type expectation on a method param.
CodePudding user response:
As @AndreyTyukin noticed, your code doesn't compile because Param
and F
don't agree in kinds
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1(param: Param): F[Param]
}
//compile error: class Param takes type parameters
final case class Param[F[_]](
field1: F[String],
field2: F[Int]
)
https://scastie.scala-lang.org/DmytroMitin/K2EHGDXERFCJisz45edMsA
Maybe you meant
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1(param: Param[F]): F[Param[F]]
}
final case class Param[F[_]](
field1: F[String],
field2: F[Int]
)
https://scastie.scala-lang.org/DmytroMitin/K2EHGDXERFCJisz45edMsA/1
func1
return type F[Param[F]]
looks like fix point https://free.cofree.io/2017/11/13/recursion/
Now my question is, what does it mean if I change my trait method signature to the following:
trait MyTrait[F[_]] { def func1(param: Param[_]): F[Param[_]] }
Instead of Param[F]
with current effect F
you're starting to use an existential type Param[_]
with arbitrary (unknown) effect, possibly different from F
.
Is this a good approach? I do not want to tie my interface to a type expectation on a method param.
Depends on your goal. Does it make sense for your setting that MyTrait
and Param
will have unconnected effects?
For example one of them is going to database while the other is writing to a file on disc. One of them is travelling through time while the other is launching missiles.
If this really makes sense for your setting to work with different effects, consider modifying the signature adding the 2nd effect type (rather than existential) on method level
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1[G[_]](param: Param[G]): F[Param[G]]
}
(Or should it be still F[Param[F]]
? This depends on your setting.)
or on type-class level
trait MyTrait[F[_], G[_]] {
def func1(param: Param[G]): F[Param[G]]
}
Or you can even try :)
trait MyTrait[F[_]] {
def func1[G[_], H[_]](param: Param[G]): F[Param[H]]
}
or
trait MyTrait[F[_], G[_], H[_]] {
def func1(param: Param[G]): F[Param[H]]
}