I am attempting to detect apriltags in image streams. Because the images come in from multiple sources at a high rate, detecting the tags in the image callback will take too long, causing images to be dropped due to missed callbacks. I have decided to store images for a few seconds at a time, and run detection on the images afterwards. Between each run of images, I would like to free all the used memory, as I will need to store multiple GB of data for each ~5 second run and images/framerates/sources change between runs.
I am using the image_u8_t type that comes with the apriltag library compiled from source:
typedef struct image_u8 image_u8_t;
struct image_u8
{
const int32_t width;
const int32_t height;
const int32_t stride;
uint8_t *buf;
};
and which has create()
and destroy()
functions (create()
is a wrapper that fills in some default values for the shown create_from_stride()
, namely stride = width:
image_u8_t *image_u8_create_stride(unsigned int width, unsigned int height, unsigned int stride)
{
uint8_t *buf = calloc(height*stride, sizeof(uint8_t));
// const initializer
image_u8_t tmp = { .width = width, .height = height, .stride = stride, .buf = buf };
image_u8_t *im = calloc(1, sizeof(image_u8_t));
memcpy(im, &tmp, sizeof(image_u8_t));
return im;
}
void image_u8_destroy(image_u8_t *im)
{
if (!im)
return;
free(im->buf);
free(im);
}
The first run of images always goes as expected, however, on the second, I consistently get errors freeing memory. It seems that although the vectors report a size=0 after using clear()
, it is retaining values at the front of the vector and iterating through them, attempting to double free memory. A minimum example of code that also shows the error is below:
#include <iostream>
#include <apriltag/apriltag.h>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
vector<vector<image_u8_t *>> images(2);
void create_images(int i){
image_u8_t * img;
img = image_u8_create(1920, 1200);
images.at(i).push_back(img);
}
int main() {
char c;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i ){
for (int j = 0; j < 2; j ){
create_images(j);
}
}
// This works fine
for (auto vec : images){
for (auto img : vec){
image_u8_destroy(img);
}
vec.clear();
}
// Just to pause and inspect output
cin >> c;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i ){
for (int j = 0; j < 2; j ){
create_images(j);
}
}
// This causes a segfault/free() error
for (auto vec : images){
for (auto img : vec){
image_u8_destroy(img);
}
vec.clear();
}
}
Printing the pointer to be freed (im->buf
) shows what seems to be happening:
Freeing image buffer at **0x7ff8cf22e010**
Freeing image buffer at 0x7ff8cedc8010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7ff8ce962010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7ff8ceffb010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7ff8ceb95010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7ff8ce72f010
c
Freeing image buffer at **0x7ff8cf22e010**
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
and the output from my real program shows a more specific but similar problem:
img u8 vector length: 92
Destroyed all images and cleared vector. New size = 0
Destroyed all images and cleared vector. New size = 0
Destroyed all images and cleared vector. New size = 0
Destroyed all images and cleared vector. New size = 0
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f2834000b80
free(): invalid pointer
Can anyone explain if I am misunderstanding how vectors work, the clear()
function specifically, or point me towards where I might be causing this issue?
Editing to add output that shows even after clearing and having size()
return 0, on the next push_back()
s, the old values seem to reappear in the vector:
Vector size before 1st clear: 3
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e34fe6010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e34b80010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e3471a010
Vector size after 1st clear: 0
Vector size before 1st clear: 3
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e34db3010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e3494d010
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e344e7010
Vector size after 1st clear: 0
c
Vector size before 2nd clear: 6
Freeing image buffer at 0x7f5e34fe6010
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
CodePudding user response:
// This works fine
for (auto vec : images){
for (auto img : vec){
image_u8_destroy(img);
}
vec.clear();
}
LOOKS like it works fine but auto vec
in for (auto vec : images)
is a value, not a reference. It makes a copy of the vector
in images
, and that means vec.clear();
cleared a copy. The original in images
still contains image_u8
instances holding now-dangling pointers.
If I'd been paying attention to the
Vector size before 2nd clear: 6
diagnostic, I'd have figured this out an hour ago when the question was first asked. Good debugging. Asker was looking at the right stuff and just missed a detail that surprises a lot of people. In C unless you ask for a reference, or you're passing around arrays, you get a value.
Solution:
// This REALLY works fine
for (auto &vec : images){
for (auto &img : vec){ // optional. You probably won't save much since `img` is
// already a pointer
image_u8_destroy(img);
}
vec.clear();
}