Please provide each master source code, I found a ring online didn't find the right,
CodePudding user response:
This code doesn't work? How to don't appropriate?CodePudding user response:
Is 32 hexadecimalNot not, but no one knows what's you literally scalar, hexadecimal we know is [0-9 a - F]
So how much is your 36 hexadecimal literally scalar? We don't know, as long as you tell us what he literally scalar is
You use the passage polynomial equation can
2 ak1c=2 the literal scalar * 32 * 32 ^ ^ 4 + A literal scalar 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
In fact you analogy the decimal
1234=1 * 10 ^ 3 + 2 * 10 * 10 ^ 1 ^ 2 + 3 + 4 * 10 ^ 0
They essentially no difference, so you tell what is the ans you literally scalar
CodePudding user response:
Suppose you the letter of the scalarA=10
B=11
C=12
D=13
E=14
F=15
16 g=
H=17
I=18
J=19
K=20
The polynomial for
32 ^ 4 + 2 ak1c=2 * 10 * 32 * 32 ^ ^ 3 + 20 32 + 12 + 1 * 2=2445356 results right
If you can read this, you can write, we don't have to stick the code