Home > OS >  Server selected Windows 2008 or centos7 more efficient?
Server selected Windows 2008 or centos7 more efficient?

Time:09-20

Runtime environment PHP + mysql + apache, pages are dynamic,

Probably how many gap, or what one's own advantage, a great god told,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the original poster flying fish cinema response:
running environment PHP + mysql + apache, pages are dynamic,

Probably how many gap, or what one's own advantage, looked great god told

I think the Linux server on
Linux is open source free first, win the copyright problems, the cost of Linux is less than win, Linux price if it is 500 pieces, win may need 600 to 1000, I haven't tested, have seen others contrast, the price is in 500 yuan or so, next Linux to use the system resources is lower, can put more performance in software,
Why do you ask such a question, if is the operations staff, the preferred is Linux, centos

CodePudding user response:

Linux resistance than Windows made o

CodePudding user response:

refer to 1st floor response: hflxhn.com
Quote: refer to the original poster flying fish cinema response:
running environment PHP + mysql + apache, pages are dynamic,

Probably how many gap, or what one's own advantage, looked great god told

I think the Linux server on
Linux is open source free first, win the copyright problems, the cost of Linux is less than win, Linux price if it is 500 pieces, win may need 600 to 1000, I haven't tested, have seen others contrast, the price is in 500 yuan or so, next Linux to use the system resources is lower, can put more performance in software,
Why do you ask such a question, if is the operations staff, the preferred is Linux, centos
thank you, personally, I also feel resource usage on Linux is on

CodePudding user response:

refer to the second floor and 蘤 old crepe reply:
Linux resistance than Windows made o
agree, thank you

CodePudding user response:

Since you ask this question, do you know about this is not very deep, so I suggest you use Windows,
A web server that have to be realistic, small company basically won't someone to buy it, if use cloud server, is genuine directly, so the copyright is not the problem, so the direct input on the Windows=Linux, but Linux operational cost is much higher,
Besides considering the safety, said online like Windows viruses, bugs, Linux nobody likes to attack, it is a parrot, first Linux system is not less than Windows have been attacked, whether the SSH login, or web vulnerability scanning and intrusion, even threatening degree, dare to play the idea of Linux, master more, because in general the Linux patch is slower than the Windows, coupled with the operations staff to patch and attack is not keen, so Linux patch will be more slow, the Windows just open automatic updates,

CodePudding user response:

Just answer was taken to a little partial, thought it was to compare the safety,
If the pursuit of efficiency, can use the Linux + Nginx + PHP

CodePudding user response:

F X
reference - I - n reply:
just answer was taken to a little partial, thought it was to compare the safety,
If the pursuit of efficiency, can use the Linux + Nginx + PHP
thanks, mainly from the comparison of efficiency

CodePudding user response:

Server does not need a graphical interface, Linux is preferred,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the eighth floor yoshubom response:
server does not need a graphical interface, Linux is preferred,
has been done, thank you
  • Related