As shown in figure, the method that can have tried is not

CodePudding user response:

Should not ah, just to load program debugging, first stop in where?
Normally, the final END there should be a main behind, indicate the program starting from the main,

CodePudding user response:

Debugging is after the end of the end the main after it, too, I am in the project - property - linker - senior - is set to the main entry point

CodePudding user response:

reference 1/f, zara's reply:

should not ah, just to load program debugging, first stop in where?
Normally, behind the END of the last should be the main, indicate the program starting from the main execution,

debug the END just like that, behind the END with the main, I in the project, properties, advanced, the entry point, set to the main

CodePudding user response:

Dizzy, I said at the beginning, you said so after

CodePudding user response:

Zara

refer to 4th floor response:

dizzy, I said at the beginning, you said so after

is here

CodePudding user response:

The information box below the last tip is project1. Exe, debugging is the CPP, there are calls the asm

CodePudding user response:

refer to 6th floor zara's reply:

information box below the last tip is project1. Exe, debugging is the CPP, is there called the asm

turn off the CPP as well

CodePudding user response:

Closed none file window doesn't matter, the key is to see the Settings in the project, your CPP quoted asm, certainly there will be no what asm,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the eighth floor zara's reply:

closed none file window doesn't matter, the key is to see the Settings in the project, your CPP not quoted the asm, certainly there will be no what asm,

thank you thank you, where is the address? urgent

CodePudding user response:

Or in a software

CodePudding user response:

Used vs, don't know your specific purpose is to learn assembly, assembly or c/c + + call obj, if is compiled, with ml directly. The compiled exe and link. Exe link; If the is c/c + + call assembly, the complicated, on both sides of naming, definition of want is consistent, then c/c + + where to have reference to the assembly function statements will form the invocation of the process; Of course, first compiled by link not wrong,