Home > OS >  Computer accounts without locking, don't know is how to return a responsibility?
Computer accounts without locking, don't know is how to return a responsibility?

Time:09-23

Firstly, in this paper, the environment I now:
1, the computer is a desktop, a lot of people log on so for everyone set up account, set up different password, I am a manager, they are standard user, the computer without building domain with other computer management,
2, I again the local security strategy - account - account locking strategies to do the setting, the diagram below:

3, I also set up a password policy, as the chart

4, the operating system is Windows 7 ultimate 64,

Second, the problems:
1, in computer management and disable accounts, sometimes cause other accounts are disabled at the same time, and I did not disable it, (in which case the number of occurrences of more)
2, in the control panel - user accounts and family safety increase account inside, can also cause other account has been disabled for no reason. (this kind of situation very little)


Three, I confused:
I don't know why the disabled can cause other accounts at the same time when an account is disabled (sometimes and not all disabled), what is what triggers the mechanism or reason, hope to have the experience of the altar of friends to help me, then thank you!

CodePudding user response:

Should not be, unless the system is not normal copy, because it is many people use, is it possible someone didn't notice the default account and use it every time you lose your password, locked the wrong several times, he was a face of vacant and innocent? Lock time to buy 0 is nothing but trouble for itself,

CodePudding user response:

reference 1/f, zara's reply:
should not be, unless the system is not normal copy, because it is many people use, is it possible someone didn't notice the default account and use it every time you lose your password, locked wrong several times, he was a face of vacant and innocent? Lock time to buy 0 is nothing but trouble for itself,

Lock time s, one is for the sake of the administrator can know the matter, who is locked, the second is to control of himself

CodePudding user response:

reference 1/f, zara's reply:
should not be, unless the system is not normal copy, because it is many people use, is it possible someone didn't notice the default account and use it every time you lose your password, locked wrong several times, he was a face of vacant and innocent? Lock time to buy 0 is nothing but trouble for itself,

I have seen this kind of situation, I log on to their management, member account unlock account for someone else, to unlock, I refresh the account list, found myself locked, at that time, I haven't logged on, conveniently give themselves the lock
  • Related