I am looking for a way to use CoreData Objects using MVVM (ditching @FetchRequest
). After experimenting, I have arrived at this implementation:
Datable.swift:
protocol Datable {
associatedtype Object: NSManagedObject
//MARK: - Mapping
static func map(from object: Object) -> Self
func map(from object: Object) -> Self
//MARK: - Entity
var object: Object {get}
//MARK: - Fetching
static var modelData: ModelData<Self> {get}
//MARK: - Writing
func save()
}
extension Datable {
static var modelData: ModelData<Self> {
return ModelData()
}
func map(from object: Object) -> Self {
return Self.map(from: object)
}
func save() {
_ = object
let viewContext = PersistenceController.shared.container.viewContext
do {
try viewContext.save()
}catch {
print(String(describing: error))
}
}
}
extension Array {
func model<T: Datable>() -> [T] {
return self.map({T.map(from: $0 as! T.Object)})
}
}
ModelData.swift:
class ModelData<T: Datable>: NSObject, ObservableObject, NSFetchedResultsControllerDelegate {
var publishedData = CurrentValueSubject<[T], Never>([])
private let fetchController: NSFetchedResultsController<NSFetchRequestResult>
override init() {
let fetchRequest = T.Object.fetchRequest()
fetchRequest.sortDescriptors = []
fetchController = NSFetchedResultsController(fetchRequest: fetchRequest, managedObjectContext: PersistenceController.shared.container.viewContext, sectionNameKeyPath: nil, cacheName: nil)
super.init()
fetchController.delegate = self
do {
try fetchController.performFetch()
publishedData.value = (fetchController.fetchedObjects as? [T.Object] ?? []).model()
}catch {
print(String(describing: error))
}
}
func controllerDidChangeContent(_ controller: NSFetchedResultsController<NSFetchRequestResult>) {
guard let data = controller.fetchedObjects as? [T.Object] else {return}
self.publishedData.value = data.model()
}
}
Attempt.swift:
struct Attempt: Identifiable, Hashable {
var id: UUID?
var password: String
var timestamp: Date
var image: Data?
}
//MARK: - Datable
extension Attempt: Datable {
var object: AttemptData {
let viewContext = PersistenceController.shared.container.viewContext
let newAttemptData = AttemptData(context: viewContext)
newAttemptData.password = password
newAttemptData.timestamp = timestamp
newAttemptData.image = image
return newAttemptData
}
static func map(from object: AttemptData) -> Attempt {
return Attempt(id: object.aid ?? UUID(), password: object.password ?? "", timestamp: object.timestamp ?? Date(), image: object.image)
}
}
ViewModel.swift:
class HomeViewModel: BaseViewModel {
@Published var attempts = [Attempt]()
required init() {
super.init()
Attempt.modelData.publishedData.eraseToAnyPublisher()
.sink { [weak self] attempts in
self?.attempts = attempts
}.store(in: &cancellables)
}
}
So far this is working like a charm, however I wanted to check if this is the best way to do it and improve it if possible. Please note that I have been using @FetchRequest
with SwiftUI for over a year now and decided to move to mvvm since I am using it in all my Storyboard projects.
CodePudding user response:
For a cutting edge way to wrap the NSFetchedResultsController
in SwiftUI compatible code you might want to take a look at AsyncStream.
However, @FetchRequest
currently is implemented as a DynamicProperty
so if you did that too it would allow access the managed object context from the @Environment
in the update
func which is called on the DynamicProperty
before body
is called on the View
. You can use an @StateObject
internally as the FRC delegate.
Be careful with MVVM because it uses objects where as SwiftUI is designed to work with value types to eliminate the kinds of consistency bugs you can get with objects. See the doc Choosing Between Structures and Classes. If you build an MVVM object layer on top of SwiftUI you risk reintroducing those bugs. You're better off using the View
data struct as it's designed and leave MVVM for when coding legacy view controllers. But to be perfectly honest, if you learn the child view controller pattern and understand the responder chain then there is really no need for MVVM view model objects at all.
And FYI, when using Combine's ObservableObject
we don't sink
the pipeline or use cancellables
. Instead, assign
the output of the pipeline to an @Published
. However, if you aren't using Combine's flagship feature, CombineLatest
, then perhaps reconsider if you should really be using Combine at all.