I'm trying to convert a snippet of code that I found (using python-social-auth) to make it handle JWT authentication instead of simple token authentification.
Here is the code:
@api_view(http_method_names=['POST'])
@permission_classes([AllowAny])
@psa()
def oauth_exchange_token_view(request, backend):
serializer = SocialAccessTokenSerializer(data=request.data)
if serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True):
# set up non-field errors key
try:
nfe = "non_field_errors"
except AttributeError:
nfe = 'non_field_errors'
try:
# this line, plus the psa decorator above, are all that's necessary to
# get and populate a user object for any properly enabled/configured backend
# which python-social-auth can handle.
user = request.backend.do_auth(serializer.validated_data['access_token'])
except HTTPError as e:
# An HTTPError bubbled up from the request to the social auth provider.
# This happens, at least in Google's case, every time you send a malformed
# or incorrect access key.
return Response(
{'errors': {
'token': 'Invalid token',
'detail': str(e),
}},
status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
)
if user:
if user.is_active:
token, _ = Token.objects.get_or_create(user=user)
return Response({'access': token.key})
else:
return Response(
{'errors': {nfe: 'This user account is inactive'}},
status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
)
else:
return Response(
{'errors': {nfe: "Authentication Failed"}},
status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
As you can see in the code above, the token is returned like this:
token, _ = Token.objects.get_or_create(user=user)
return Response({'access': token.key})
But I would like it to return a JWT using djangorestframework-simplejwt instead.
CodePudding user response:
Finally found a solution:
from rest_framework_simplejwt.tokens import RefreshToken
# ...
@api_view(http_method_names=['POST'])
@permission_classes([AllowAny])
def register_view(request):
# ...
if user:
if user.is_active:
refresh = RefreshToken.for_user(user)
res = {
'refresh': str(refresh),
'access': str(refresh.access_token),
}
return Response(res)
# ...
CodePudding user response:
You don't need to write your views for simplejwt. Just go step-by-step in documentation. For most use cases "getting started" configure for simplejwt is enough.