Suppose to have the following definitions
struct Cla {
void w(int x){}
};
template <typename C, void (C::*m)(int)> void callm(C *c, int args) {}
template <typename C, typename... A, void (C::*m)(A...)>
void callmv(C *c, A &&...args) {}
int main(){
callm<Cla, &Cla::w>(&cla, 3);
callmv<Cla, int, &Cla::w>(&cla, 3);
}
The first function (callm) is ok. The second (callmv), however, does not compile, and g gives the following error message
test.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
test.cpp:84:28: error: no matching function for call to ‘callmv<Cla, int, &Cla::w>(Cla*, int)’
84 | callmv<Cla, int, &Cla::w>(&cla, 3);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:52:6: note: candidate: ‘template<class C, class ... A, void (C::* m)(A ...)> void callmv(C*, A&& ...)’
52 | void callmv(C *c, A &&...args) {}
| ^~~~~~
test.cpp:52:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
test.cpp:84:28: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template parameter list for ‘template<class C, class ... A, void (C::* m)(A ...)> void callmv(C*, A&& ...)’
84 | callmv<Cla, int, &Cla::w>(&cla, 3);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:84:28: note: expected a type, got ‘&Cla::w’
What is the correct syntax? (I already checked Methods as variadic template arguments )
CodePudding user response:
All parameters after a variadic parameter pack are always deduced and can never be passed explicitly. &Cla::w
is being interpreted as the next type argument in the parameter pack A
, not the non-type template argument. The error you get is the compiler complaining about &Cla::w
not being a type.
Which means you have to pass the member function first
template <typename M, M m, typename C, typename... A>
void callmv(C* c, A&&... args) {}
callmv<decltype(&Cla::w), &Cla::w>(&cla, 3);
Alternatively, you can wrap the member function
template<typename F, typename... Args>
void callf(F f, Args&&... args)
{
f(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
callf([](Cla* c, int i) { c->w(i); }, &c, 42);