Want to ask strategy of routing problems, such as two users: 1 and 2, the address is 192.168.31.5/24 and 210.0.15.5/24 respectively, I now want to use routing implementation strategy: after user 1 data arrives at A router, forced to let it go "mobile line" to the router B; User 2 data arrives at A router, forced to let it go "unicom line" to B router, but now the situation is the user really can reach router B 1 and 2, but users are 2 B router "mobile line" arrived, don't know why can appear such circumstance,

A router configuration:
The acl number 3001
Rule 5 permit IP source 192.168.31.0 0.0.0.255
The acl number 3002
Rule 5 permit IP source 210.0.15.0 0.0.0.255
#
Traffic classifier a2 operator or
If - match acl 3002
Traffic classifier a1 operator or
If - match acl 3001
#
Traffic behaviors b2
Redirect IP - nexthop 192.168.100.3
Traffic behaviors b1
Redirect IP - nexthop 192.168.201.3
#
Traffic policy pp
Classifier a1 behaviors b1
Classifier a2 behaviors b2
#
Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
IP address 192.168.31.100 255.255.255.0
Traffic - the policy pp the inbound
#
Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
IP address 210.0.15.100 255.255.255.0
Traffic - the policy pp the inbound
#
Interface GigabitEthernet0/.two survivors
IP address 192.168.201.2 255.255.255.252
#
Interface GigabitEthernet4/0/0
IP address 192.168.100.114 255.255.255.252

CodePudding user response:

Back and forth path has a problem, you can only use a strategy to redirect to the next jump, and then write a default route

CodePudding user response:

Router with 2 operators to end, you directly in 2 lines to connect to a simulated operator router must have a problem, that the router back pack that way? This experiment is wrong, you
Too simple==