Double routing strange problems, consult everybody a great god-CodePudding

CodePudding user response:

Actually light cat, also is a router, so you get in to set not depends on the routers, have to go to, you can set, but generally telecom is not going to tell you,

CodePudding user response:

reference 1st floor Iforgetmyid response:

light cat, actually is also a router, so you get in to set not depends on the routers, have to go to, you can set, but generally telecom is not going to tell you,

thank you,

I met problem and you said a little different

CodePudding user response:

You are in the main from the vice routing is added to the routing table, added to the main road in the vice routing by routing table try

CodePudding user response:

Two routers is set to the same network segment, the bridge is not routing,

CodePudding user response:

For router, cat is light, only to the wide area network routing, LAN segments to you no other route, you can put the LAN segment set consistent, can also modify the router's routing table, add the static routing,

CodePudding user response:

1. Consider the main by the new routing routing to vice record
Part 2. High-end routing products will restrict access management interface default needs and which segment by LAN segment is consistent, what will happen in other segment access remote access network segment is installed, can find

CodePudding user response:

Thank you for your greatly, in combination with each big suggestion, to find some information on the net, see an article:
https://blog.csdn.net/gengyiping18/article/details/53581534/
Say a simple, very detailed, I can now confirm the primary reason is that the routing table did not add,

But as shown in figure is my home network topology:

Now the routing is A routing table is set to:

The routing table is set to route B:

But the two segment below the host can't visits, more specifically for example:
Routers A host can ping 192.168.50. X and 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.4,
But can't ping 192.168.123 X and 192.168.1.3,
Is there where the setup is not right, hope all greatly help to look at, thank you

CodePudding user response:

refer to 7th floor LikeNOther response:

thank you for your greatly, in combination with each big suggestion, to find some information on the net, see an article:
https://blog.csdn.net/gengyiping18/article/details/53581534/
Say a simple, very detailed, I can now confirm the primary reason is that the routing table did not add,

But as shown in figure is my home network topology:

Now the routing is A routing table is set to:

The routing table is set to route B:

But the two segment below the host can't visits, more specifically for example:
Routers A host can ping 192.168.50. X and 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.4,
But can't ping 192.168.123 X and 192.168.1.3,
Is there where the setup is not right, hope all greatly help to look at, thank you

Question, light your cat routing, cat you didn't shut the DHCP, light it and routing functions, you can turn off the DHCP, used as a switch, your route is no problem,

CodePudding user response:

refer to the eighth floor qq_18980145 response:

Quote: refer to 7th floor LikeNOther response:
thank you for your greatly, in combination with each big suggestion, to find some information on the net, see an article:
https://blog.csdn.net/gengyiping18/article/details/53581534/
Say a simple, very detailed, I can now confirm the primary reason is that the routing table did not add,

But as shown in figure is my home network topology:

Now the routing is A routing table is set to:

The routing table is set to route B:

But the two segment below the host can't visits, more specifically for example:
Routers A host can ping 192.168.50. X and 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.4,
But can't ping 192.168.123 X and 192.168.1.3,
Is there where the setup is not right, hope all greatly help to look at, thank you

Question, light your cat routing, cat you didn't shut the DHCP, light it and routing functions, you can turn off the DHCP, used as a switch, your route is no problem,

It'll be up shit creek, unicom, with the light of the cat, there is no set of switch DHCP,

CodePudding user response:

The home router, is that you can't configure the router, you not seriously look to set static routing with words, two routers are written with a words: "for if you are connected to the XXX after several routers in order to share... Said, "they mean you this two routers, if below to connect the router may need to set up this,
Actually, home router, it is the wan side, as the Internet, LAN mouth side, as a network, then use NAT out, when you prepare a wan, LAN IP after mouth, it will automatically into a route, is to point to the wan port gateway all the exits,

CodePudding user response:

Don't you know that the two on the road by interface can't change, if can change, to try "wan" ports,

CodePudding user response:

This is because from the main road by the deputy routing is equivalent to vice routing from wan port access to the LAN port, add a NAT rules on vice routing, transfer to the wan port port 80 packets to a LAN port

CodePudding user response:

Was I also said, what is missing? You put the static routing interface to wan try

CodePudding user response:

Thank you very much?? , well, yes, automatically generated routing is used to connect the Internet, I now the question is manually configure static routing table under different routing implementation, the exchange of visits between the host don't know if I have the understanding to?