As generics have been released in Go 1.18 pretty recently, I've started learning them. I generally get the concept, because I have some Java experience from the past. But I don't get some implementation specifics.

For instance: when it's more suitable to use any instead of interface{}? Here's an example:

func printInterface(foo interface{}) {
    fmt.Printf("%v\n", foo)
}

func printAny[T any](foo T) {
    fmt.Printf("%v\n", foo)
}

func (suite *TestSuite) TestString() {
    printInterface("foo")
    printAny("foo")
}

Both implementations work. However, if I try to print nil with any-version, I'll get a compile-time error:

cannot infer T.

https://go.dev/play/p/0gmU4rhhaOP

And I won't get this error if I try to print nil with interface{}-version.

So what's the use-case for any? When and which benefits does it bring, compared to simply using interface{}?

I'm asking to provide a specific example, where one implementation is objectively more suitable than another and/or where there is a specific benefit that can be evaluated.

CodePudding user response：

any is an alias for interface{}. Spec: Interface types:

For convenience, the predeclared type any is an alias for the empty interface.

Since it is an alias, it doesn't matter which one you use. They are one and the same. They are interchangeable. You can replace one with the other, the code will mean the same.

any is shorter and clearer, but only works from Go 1.18.

Since they are interchangeable, this also works:

func printInterface(foo any) {
    fmt.Printf("%v\n", foo)
}

The reason why printAny() doesn't work is due to it being a generic function with a type parameter. To use it, it must be instantiated (its type parameter must be assigned with a known type). Trying to call it with nil carries no type information, so instantiation cannot happen, type inference won't work.

If you call it with a nil value that carries type info, it'll work, or if you specify the type param explicitly (try it on the Go Playground):

printAny((*int)(nil))
printAny[*int](nil)
// Or
var r io.Reader
printAny(r)

And as said, any is interchangeable with interface{}, so you'll have the same code if you swap both occurrences (try this one on the Go Playground):

func printInterface(foo any) {
    fmt.Printf("%v\n", foo)
}

func printAny[T interface{}](foo T) {
    fmt.Printf("%v\n", foo)
}

CodePudding user response：

I believe the biggest reason for adding any as an alias of interface{} is semantic.

However, your issue is not related to the usage of any/interface{} but it is type inference. As you can see from this playground, if you instantiate your function with an explicit type, like printAny[any](nil) it will work.

If you have a function with generic type you need to specify the types. However the go compiler is very smart and can infer some types for you. But nil alone is impossible to infer.