I have an array Nx3 of N points, each one has X, Y and Z coordinate. I need to rotate each point, so i have the rotation matrix 3x3. To do this, i need to get dot product of the rotation matrix and each point. The problem is the array of points is quite massive (~1_000_000x3) and therefore it takes noticeable amount of time to compute the rotated points.
The only solution i come up with so far is simple for loop iterating over array of points. Here is the example with a piece of data:
# Given set of points Nx3: np.ndarray
points = np.array([
[285.679, 219.75, 524.733],
[285.924, 219.404, 524.812],
[285.116, 219.217, 524.813],
[285.839, 219.557, 524.842],
[285.173, 219.507, 524.606]
])
points_t = points.T
# Array to store results
points_rotated = np.empty((points_t.shape))
# Given rotation matrix 3x3: np.ndarray
rot_matrix = np.array([
[0.57423549, 0.81862056, -0.01067613],
[-0.81866133, 0.57405696, -0.01588193],
[-0.00687256, 0.0178601, 0.99981688]
])
for i in range(points.shape[0]):
points_rotated[:, i] = np.dot(rot_matrix, points_t[:, i])
# Result
points_rotated.T
# [[ 338.33677093 -116.05910163 526.59831864]
# [ 338.1933725 -116.45955203 526.6694408 ]
# [ 337.5762975 -115.90543822 526.67265381]
# [ 338.26949115 -116.30261156 526.70275207]
# [ 337.84863885 -115.78233784 526.47047941]]
I dont feel confident using numpy as i quite new to it, so i'm sure there is at least more elegant way to do. I've heard about np.einsum()
but i don't understand yet how to implement it here and i'm not sure it will make it quicker. And the main problem is still the computation time, so i want to now how to make it work faster?
Thank you very much in advance!
CodePudding user response:
You can write the code using numba parallelization in no python mode as:
@nb.njit("float64[:, ::1](float64[:, ::1], float64[:, ::1])", parallel=True)
def dot(a, b): # dot(points, rot_matrix)
dot_ = np.zeros((a.shape[0], b.shape[0]))
for i in nb.prange(a.shape[0]):
for j in range(b.shape[0]):
dot_[i, j] = a[i, 0] * b[j, 0] a[i, 1] * b[j, 1] a[i, 2] * b[j, 2]
return dot_
It must be better than ko3 answer due to parallelization and signatures and using algebra instead np.dot
. I have tested similar code (that was applied just on upper triangle of an array) instead dot product in another answer which showed that was at least 2 times faster (as far as I can remember).
CodePudding user response:
If the number of iterations is large, you could try out numba's njit
method:
from numba import njit
points = np.array([
[285.679, 219.75, 524.733],
[285.924, 219.404, 524.812],
[285.116, 219.217, 524.813],
[285.839, 219.557, 524.842],
[285.173, 219.507, 524.606]
])
rot_matrix = np.array([
[0.57423549, 0.81862056, -0.01067613],
[-0.81866133, 0.57405696, -0.01588193],
[-0.00687256, 0.0178601, 0.99981688]
])
@njit
def compute(points, rot_matrix):
points_t = points.T
points_rotated = np.empty((points_t.shape))
for i in range(points.shape[0]):
points_rotated[:, i] = np.dot(rot_matrix, points_t[:, i])
return points_rotated.T
compute(points, rot_matrix)
It is especially designed for large iterations and should accelerate the operation by a lot. Check out the documentation for more.
CodePudding user response:
I have tried some codes to see the performance of each solution (based on my system) on 1,000,000 x 3 matrix.
- Using
np.matmul
- Using numba njit with dot product(@)
- Using numba njit with your code
Here are the results of three functions.
points = np.random.rand(1000000,3)
rot_matrix = np.array([
[0.57423549, 0.81862056, -0.01067613],
[-0.81866133, 0.57405696, -0.01588193],
[-0.00687256, 0.0178601, 0.99981688]
# Using np.matmul
def function_matmul(points, rot_matrix):
return np.matmul(rot_matrix @ points.T).T
# Using numba njit with dot product(@)
@njit
def function_numba_dot(points, rot_matrix):
return (rot_matrix, points.T).T
# Using numba njit with your code
@njit
def function_ori_code(points, rot_matrix):
points_t = points.T
points_rotated = np.empty((points_t.shape))
for i in range(points.shape[0]):
points_rotated[:, i] = np.dot(rot_matrix, points_t[:, i])
return points_rotated.T
%timeit function_matmul(points, rot_matrix)
16.5 ms ± 665 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
%timeit function_numba_dot(points, rot_matrix)
16.3 ms ± 69.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
%timeit function_ori_code(points, rot_matrix)
260 ms ± 4.37 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)