I've tried specifying the type in two different places, but the compiler still throws an error.
use serde::Serialize;
// 1: try to set default type.
struct Student<T = Option<String>> {
age: i32,
data: T
}
impl<T> Student<T> where T: Serialize {
fn new(age: i32) -> Self {
Student {
age,
data: <Option<String>>::None // 2. try to set default type
}
}
// fn new_with_data(age: i32, data: T) -> Self {
// Student {
// age,
// data
// }
// }
}
fn main() {
let stu1 = Student::new(123);
//let stu2 = Student::new_with_data(123, <Option<()>>::None);
}
got error:
Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:13:19
|
8 | impl<T> Student<T> where T: Serialize {
| - this type parameter
...
13 | data: <Option<String>>::None
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `T`, found enum `std::option::Option`
|
= note: expected type parameter `T`
found enum `std::option::Option<std::string::String>`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
error: could not compile `playground` due to previous error
the play link: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=749e31fae6091226b99e233a016ca0c8
CodePudding user response:
The issue is while you set a default type, the impl
block does not require that T
is the default. <Option<String>>::None
is only a valid value if the type is Option<String>
, but this does not require that to be the case.
/// `T` is unconstrained and may or may not be `Option<T>`
impl<T> Student<T> {}
/// This implements student for only one specific generic type (`Option<String>`). This
/// functionality will not be available for other generic types.
impl Student<Option<String>> {}
/// Here we don't include the generic so it implements for only the default generic. This is
/// equivalent to the previous version, but the generic is assumed to be the default value.
impl Student {}
What I suspect you want to do is make the data generic. Instead of making the the Option
generic, we just make the data it holds generic. We can still set a default value without running into this issue.
struct Student<T = String> {
age: i32,
/// Some optional generic data
data: Option<T>
}
impl<T> Student<T> where T: Serialize {
fn new(age: i32) -> Self {
Student {
age,
data: None,
}
}
fn new_with_data(age: i32, data: T) -> Self {
Student {
age,
data: Some(data),
}
}
}
Another option would be to keep the type the same, but split the impl
to two parts. This way we can require the use of new_with_data
if the data is not an Option
, but still allow the usage of new
in some cases.
struct Student<T = Option<String>> {
age: i32,
data: T
}
impl<T> Student<Option<T>> where T: Serialize {
fn new(age: i32) -> Self {
Student {
age,
data: None,
}
}
}
impl<T> Student<T> where T: Serialize {
fn new_with_data(age: i32, data: T) -> Self {
Student { age, data }
}
}
CodePudding user response:
According to your method, I made a little modification and realized what I wanted.
use serde::Serialize;
struct Student<T = Option<String>> {
age: i32,
/// Some optional generic data
data: T
}
impl Student<Option<String>> {
fn new(age: i32) -> Self {
Student {
age,
data: None,
}
}
}
impl<T> Student<T> where T: Serialize {
fn new_with_data(age: i32, data: T) -> Self {
Student {
age, data
}
}
}
fn main() {
let stu1 = Student::new(123);
let stu2 = Student::new_with_data(123, 2222);
}