Question 1: a mixture of RIPV1 and RIPv2
R1 and R3 routing table below
So the result is learnt RIPv2 RIPV1 routing, but not learn RIPV1 routing RIPv2, why?
Question 2: RIPv2 configuration
RIPv2 configuration version 2 and no auto - after a summery is classful routing protocols? Explain why I 172.16.1.0 R1 ride along on the R2, 1,0,2,0
If he did have the class I test RIP v1 ditto topology, in 2.0 after R1 R2 above statement 172.16.1.0 and topology is
R1 # sh IP route rip
R along/16 [120/1] via 12.1.1.2, 00:00:20 Serial0/0
R1 #
Question 3:
RIPv1 has such features, to construct a loop to play, but no structure out
Suppose to funnel 172.16.0.1 R2; 1.1; 2.1 will converge to the address of 22 mask, there is no segment of 3.0, but R2 if R1 is export gateway, there will be a default route on R2, when there is a terminal on the R2 to access 3.1, will go looking for R1, R2 but R1 according to the knowledge of the 22 routing mask will point to R2, mutual guidance loop, in theory, but not implemented in the process of simulation, triggered a routing redistribution,
Bosses genuflect is begged.
