CodePudding user response:

192.168.1.x ping 192.168.3. X is not, of course, because the average home wireless router, network access, networks outside is 192.168.3. Visit 192.168.1. X X, is the way the NAT, namely the address into a wireless router outside the network 192.168.1. X to access 192.168.1. X piece, if you want to 192.168.1. X can ping 192.168.3. X, need 192.168.1. X and 192.168.3. Between X, to transmit data by means of routing, and this is the general home wireless router is unable to realize,

CodePudding user response:

But I need to use the wireless router wireless networks, otherwise, can be achieved, if I were in power grid gateway can add such a routing with 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 can pass like this? Telecom has a routing is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 61. X.X.X,

CodePudding user response:

According to the topology, you do it is also useless, you want to, telecom on the gateway which have 192.168.3. X port? Telecommunication gateway only two ports: 192.168.1 X and the Internet address, with your wireless router USES is actually a way: NAT, if you really want to make 192.168.1. X period of computer with 192.168.3. X computer communications, wireless router port mapping approach, commonly part can be achieved, but access, the destination address still need to use a wireless router's wan port address, namely 192.168.1. X segment address, wireless router will then transfer the data to 192.168.3. X a IP address of a port,

CodePudding user response:

That means 192.168.3. X this address do port mapping, mapping the address of the corresponding is 192.168.1 X, a computer can be accessed, is this meaning? Don't want to visit, must add switches, is not?

CodePudding user response:

Don't want to use impassability 3 network segment? If don't have to turn off the wireless router DHCP, into a bridge, wireless users access to a network segment, can be exchanged,

CodePudding user response:

reference 5 floor YEJY reply:

must use impassability 3 network segment? If don't have to turn off the wireless router DHCP, into a bridge, wireless users access to a network segment, can be exchanged,

The less I say LAN mouth not to go,

CodePudding user response:

Fifth floor positive solution, LAN mouth can also, all are 1 X network segment

CodePudding user response:

refer to the second floor at that time you must be very pain response:

but I need to use the wireless router wireless networks, otherwise, can be achieved, if I were in power grid gateway can add such a routing with 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 can pass like this? Telecom has a routing is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 61 X.X.X,

shut in telecommunication network routing way can try to write, but the next-hop address not 192.168.1.1, but under the wireless router wan mouth 192.168.1 X network segment address, use the port mapping is wireless router has already made a NAT192.168.3 default. The X-ray & gt; The operation of 192.168.1.x,

CodePudding user response:

Actually can also be, as long as you turn off the DHCP, LAN port, the router is equivalent to a switch, access the address is, of course, a wireless connection 192.168.1. X

CodePudding user response:

Difficult to feel good, I only know that can have a static routing between routing and routing can be such, also can match ospf,
This won't

CodePudding user response:

1, determine the wireless router IP into line (metaphor appointed 192.168.1.200)
2, add static routing in telecommunication networks shut 192.168.3.0 24 192.168.1.200
3, test

CodePudding user response:

refer to the second floor at that time you must be very pain response:

but I need to use the wireless router wireless networks, otherwise, can be achieved, if I were in power grid gateway can add such a routing with 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 can pass like this? Telecom has a routing is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 61 X.X.X,

Routing write wrong 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1. XX here is the IP address of the wireless router

CodePudding user response:

refer to 12th floor do not want to speak dumb reply:

Quote: refer to the second floor at that time you must be very pain response:

but I need to use the wireless router wireless networks, otherwise, can be achieved, if I were in power grid gateway can add such a routing with 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 can pass like this? Telecom has a routing is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 61 X.X.X,

Routing write wrong 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1. XX is the IP address of the wireless router here

Specified directly his address, if I don't have to visit him this computer I 192.168.1.1 segment gateway, access gateway, I shouldn't can access, each computer is configured with a static address, as I wrote before, there should be no defect,

CodePudding user response:

Two different ways to
1. The cost is high, but stable, future development and change operators gateway under the fool switches to layer 3 switches, do static routing to 3 segments inside
2. The cost is low, but a waste of wireless router function, is upstairs said bring wireless router to wireless switches, it is on a network segment, ping tong